2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality of Elderly Patients After Two-Stage Reimplantation for Total Joint Infection: A Case–Control Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As already reported, we found no difference between hip and knee prosthesis but a higher mortality in men compared to women and an increased mortality with age 3,4,7,11-13. Higher mortality due to enterococci has already been hypothesized to be related to the intrinsic antimicrobial resistance to b -lactams which are used as prophylactic antibiotics before revision surgery 7.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already reported, we found no difference between hip and knee prosthesis but a higher mortality in men compared to women and an increased mortality with age 3,4,7,11-13. Higher mortality due to enterococci has already been hypothesized to be related to the intrinsic antimicrobial resistance to b -lactams which are used as prophylactic antibiotics before revision surgery 7.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…(7) Our results are closer to the recent ones by Lum et al (3,9,10) As already reported, we found no difference between hip and knee prosthesis but a higher mortality in men compared to women and an increased mortality with age. (3,4,7,(11)(12)(13) Higher mortality due to enterococci has already been hypothesized to be related to the intrinsic antimicrobial resistance to b-lactams which are used as prophylactic antibiotics before revision surgery. (7) The current study also shows surprisingly, and never described before, that patients treated with a one-stage or two-stage exchange have a lower mortality than the ones treated with debridement and retention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who undergo revision surgery for PJI have a higher risk of unplanned readmission [19] and longer length of stay [23] compared with patients who undergo revision surgery for other causes, which implies that PJI has a major effect on a patient's health. One study showed that revision for PJI in THAs or TKAs is associated with higher mortality than aseptic revision [27], but not all studies have found this association [4,24]. None of the previous published studies exclusively investigated the associated between revision for early postoperative PJI in primary THA and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, one study including THA and TKA showed that there is an increased mortality risk within 1 year after revision for PJI [27]. However, not all studies have identified PJI to be associated with a higher mortality risk [4,24], and so far studies of PJI and mortality have been based on a mixture of THA and TKA [24,27], patients from a single institution [4,24,27], and without a maximum defined interval from primary THA surgery to revision for PJI [4,24,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a busy surgeon treats a few dozen patients a year with PJI of the hip (or even a couple hundred), it would be all-but-impossible for her to discern reliably a doubling or even a tripling of an event that happens to only a few percent of her patients. And even large studies are susceptible to drawing discordant conclusions about rare events [1,3,4], since event-rate estimates in this setting often are beset by wide confidence intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%