2007
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000258816.02021.b9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality of stroke patients treated with thrombolysis: Analysis of nationwide inpatient sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In unadjusted analyses, mortality (vs survival) in the NIS cohort was associated with the demographic variables of older age (75.1 vs 69.3 years, p < 0.001), non-Hispanic white race (73.6% vs 68.3%, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (45.0% vs 24.9%, p < 0.001), and higher median NIHSS score (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) vs 4 [IQR 2-8], p < 0.001; Table 1). In the harmonized cohort, mortality (vs survival) was associated with older age (73.6 vs 65.5 years, p < 0.001), diabetes (36.2% vs 28.3%, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (31.9% vs 13.4%, p < 0.001), and higher median NIHSS score (19)(20)(21)(22) vs 3 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], p < 0.001). The multivariable models did not have evidence of multicollinearity in either cohort (mean VIF in NIS cohort 2.67 and in harmonized cohort 2.13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In unadjusted analyses, mortality (vs survival) in the NIS cohort was associated with the demographic variables of older age (75.1 vs 69.3 years, p < 0.001), non-Hispanic white race (73.6% vs 68.3%, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (45.0% vs 24.9%, p < 0.001), and higher median NIHSS score (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) vs 4 [IQR 2-8], p < 0.001; Table 1). In the harmonized cohort, mortality (vs survival) was associated with older age (73.6 vs 65.5 years, p < 0.001), diabetes (36.2% vs 28.3%, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (31.9% vs 13.4%, p < 0.001), and higher median NIHSS score (19)(20)(21)(22) vs 3 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], p < 0.001). The multivariable models did not have evidence of multicollinearity in either cohort (mean VIF in NIS cohort 2.67 and in harmonized cohort 2.13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta‐analysis of the ECASS‐1, ECASS‐2, ECASS‐3, and ATLANTIS trials also failed to show a survival benefit for IV‐tPA, but was likewise underpowered 47 . A prior analysis of NIS data suggested that IV‐tPA increased mortality, but the analysis was not adjusted for stroke severity and, thus, inherently flawed 3,4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The treatment window using tPA is in 4.5 h when patients show the stroke symptom, and the outcomes dramatically decrease beyond 4.5 h [ 35 ]. However, tPA treatment may potentially cause the intracerebral hemorrhage and lead to more mortality [ 36 ]. When patients appear with a large artery occlusion (the clot burden is high) or tPA treatment is beyond the best time window, the MT surgery is an alternative strategy to treat ischemic stroke.…”
Section: Pathology Of Stroke and Current Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, tPA application is the most widely accepted and implemented treatment method for ischemic stroke, although it is only effective when quickly applied in the time window of 4.5 h following the initiation of stroke ( Yoo et al, 2011 ), and in some cases it can go up to 6 h ( Snelling et al, 2019 ). In addition to the narrow time window, there is a certain risk of reperfusion damage that makes the treatment capacity of tPA limited on most patients ( Kurth et al, 2007 ). If the size of the clot occluding the vein is large than the tPA treatment limits or the time window is outlasted, MT surgery is the alternative treatment in which a microcatheter is used to directly remove the clot, although it is a risk involved solution that is far from being perfect ( Dong et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%