Objective
Recent transcriptomic studies describe two subgroups of adults with sepsis differentiated by a sepsis response signature (SRS). The implied biology and related clinical associations are comparable to recently reported pediatric sepsis endotypes, labeled “A” and “B”. We classified adults with sepsis using the pediatric endotyping strategy and the SRS, and determined how endotype assignment, SRS membership, and age interact with respect to mortality.
Design
Retrospective analysis of publically available transcriptomic data representing critically ill adults with sepsis from which the SRS groups were derived and validated.
Setting
Multiple intensive care units.
Patients
Adults with sepsis
Interventions
None.
Measurements and Main Results
Transcriptomic data were co-normalized into a single data set yielding 549 unique cases with SRS assignments. Each subject was assigned to endotype A or B using the expression data for the 100 endotyping genes. There were 163 subjects (30%) assigned to endotype A and 386 to endotype B. There was a weak, positive correlation between endotype assignment and SRS membership. Mortality rates were similar between patients assigned endotype A and those assigned endotype B. A multivariable logistic regression model fit to endotype assignment, SRS membership, age, and the respective two-way interactions revealed that endotype A, SRS1 membership, older age, and the interactions between them were associated with mortality. Subjects co-assigned to endotype A and SRS1 had the highest mortality.
Conclusions
Combining the pediatric endotyping strategy with SRS membership might provide complementary, age-dependent, biological and prognostic information.