1991
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199102000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality prediction models in intensive care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other scores, such as the Ranson or the Glasgow system, the APACHE system allows The relation was significant: p Ͻ 0.0001. assessment beyond 48 hours after admission [17]. Studies have shown that the APACHE II score represents a reliable predictor of hospital outcome [18], and that it can be used prospectively as well as retrospectively [19,20]. Corresponding to the surgical literature dealing with the prediction of mortality by APACHE II scores, the expected mortality rates referring to a mean APACHE II score of 16 range from 35% to 50% [21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to other scores, such as the Ranson or the Glasgow system, the APACHE system allows The relation was significant: p Ͻ 0.0001. assessment beyond 48 hours after admission [17]. Studies have shown that the APACHE II score represents a reliable predictor of hospital outcome [18], and that it can be used prospectively as well as retrospectively [19,20]. Corresponding to the surgical literature dealing with the prediction of mortality by APACHE II scores, the expected mortality rates referring to a mean APACHE II score of 16 range from 35% to 50% [21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%