2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12941-016-0122-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality predictors of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a prospective multicenter study

Abstract: BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus is one of the causes of both community and healthcare-associated bacteremia. The attributable mortality of S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) is still higher and predictors for mortality and clinical outcomes of this condition are need to be clarified. In this prospective observational study, we aimed to examine the predictive factors for mortality in patients with SAB in eight Turkish tertiary care hospitals.MethodsAdult patients with signs and symptoms of bacteremia with positive bloo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
44
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
44
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The second death was also in a patient with aortic valve endocarditis with indication for surgery that refused surgical treatment and died of complications due to endocarditis. This is not an unexpected finding since mortality from bacteremia and endocarditis is fairly high, ranging from 20%‐30% in prior reports …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second death was also in a patient with aortic valve endocarditis with indication for surgery that refused surgical treatment and died of complications due to endocarditis. This is not an unexpected finding since mortality from bacteremia and endocarditis is fairly high, ranging from 20%‐30% in prior reports …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This is not an unexpected finding since mortality from bacteremia and endocarditis is fairly high, ranging from 20%-30% in prior reports. 19,20 In this small series, we show that patients implanted with a Micra pacemaker who developed bacteremia (mainly with S. aureus and other virulent bacteria such as VRE) did not show any clear signs of device seeding and the majority of patients responded to antibiotics without any evidence of persistent or recurrent infection with the same organism. Patients with recurrent bacteremia developed the second event a mean of 223 days after the initial episode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Outcomes of MRSA infection in comparison with MSSA infection are frequently studied in human hospitals due to concern about increased mortality from drug resistance and also to assess the impact on healthcare cost. Although some of the more recent reports appear to document an increased risk of mortality in certain patient groups with MRSA, conflicting results remain, likely due to the heterogeneity of MRSA infections (blood stream infections versus skin and soft tissue infections) and healthcare provision and bias from patient characteristics (age, co‐morbidities). In a case series of 11 dogs with MRSA surgical site or skin infection, systemic antibacterial therapy based on susceptibility testing improved or resolved the infection in nine of 11 dogs; one dog had been euthanized with radiographic evidence of osteomyelitis, the other lost to follow‐up .…”
Section: Treatment Outcomes For Staphylococcal Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with high morbidity and mortality . Compliance with evidence‐based quality‐of‐care indicators (QCIs) in the treatment improves a patient's prognosis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, infectious diseases caused by methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are different from those caused by methicillin‐sensitive S. aureus , and, specifically, differences in the vulnerability of the affected populations and delays in commencing appropriate antimicrobial therapy lead to worse outcomes in cases of MRSA infection. Furthermore, in cases of SAB, methicillin resistance is reported to be an independent factor exacerbating prognosis . There are no reports evaluating the QCIs for MRSA bacteremia (MRSA‐B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%