We analyzed 83 fully sequenced great ape genomes for mobile element insertions, predicting a total of 49,452 fixed and polymorphic Alu and long interspersed element 1 (L1) insertions not present in the human reference assembly and assigning each retrotransposition event to a different time point during great ape evolution. We used these homoplasy-free markers to construct a mobile element insertions-based phylogeny of humans and great apes and demonstrate their differential power to discern ape subspecies and populations. Within this context, we find a good correlation between L1 diversity and single-nucleotide polymorphism heterozygosity (r 2 = 0.65) in contrast to Alu repeats, which show little correlation (r 2 = 0.07). We estimate that the "rate" of Alu retrotransposition has differed by a factor of 15-fold in these lineages. Humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos show the highest rates of Alu accumulation-the latter two since divergence 1.5 Mya. The L1 insertion rate, in contrast, has remained relatively constant, with rates differing by less than a factor of three. We conclude that Alu retrotransposition has been the most variable form of genetic variation during recent human-great ape evolution, with increases and decreases occurring over very short periods of evolutionary time.genomics | genetic diversity | structural variation | retrotransposon M obile elements comprise ∼50% of our genetic code. Among these, Alu (a primate-specific short interspersed element, SINE) and L1 repeats (a long interspersed element, LINE) are the most abundant (1, 2). Both elements propagated in the germ line as a result of target primed reverse transcription (TPRT) using an AP-endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities encoded by L1 elements (3-5). These integrations-termed "mobile element insertions" (MEIs)-have the potential to disrupt genes, alter transcript expression and splicing, as well as promote genomic instability as a result of nonallelic homologous recombination (6-9). In addition, these MEIs are powerful phylogenetic (10-12) and population genetic markers (13-16) because they are generally regarded as homoplasy-free character states-i.e., precise excision is an exceedingly rare event and, as such, the ancestral and derived state can be unambiguously determined (17)(18)(19)(20).Critical to our understanding of MEI impact with respect to disease and evolution is a detailed assessment of changes in retrotransposition activity within different lineages (21). Genome sequencing comparisons have been used as one method to infer differences in activity between humans and great apes (22-26). There are several important limitations of previous studies. First, genome-wide assessments are generally incomplete because of their dependence on a single representative genome from each species, where consequently the fixed versus polymorphic status of most MEIs is not known. Second, published great ape genome assemblies vary considerably in quality and completeness. The gorilla genome, for example, was assembled primarily from Ill...