Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin—a new era of evolution (2007–2013)

Kirpichnikov, Mikhaǐl P.; Хохлов, А. Н.

doi:10.3103/s0096392514030110

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Нам кажется, что в основном -за счет слабого (или никакого) рецензирования / редактирования рукописей и неограниченного объема выпусков (до десятков и даже сотен тысяч статей в год!). Занимаясь изданием достаточно серьезного научного журнала [8][9][10], мы в принципе не можем себе представить, как можно осуществить нормальное рецензирование и последующее редактирование (текст, таблицы, иллюстрации, список литературы) научной статьи в те сроки, которые обещают «хищники». Но самое главное (это наше ЛИЧНОЕ мнение) -опубликоваться у них, как уже говорилось, ГОРАЗДО легче, чем у «травоядных».…”

Section: S43unclassified

Herbivore journals vs predatory journals – the battle is already lost, what’s next?

Хохлов

Моргунова

2022

Naučnyj redaktor i izdatelʹ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors divided scientific journals into two main categories – “herbivore journals” (subscription journals that do not charge authors for the publication of their articles) and “predatory journals” – paid journals that adhere to unscrupulous editorial and ethical policies. Accordingly, “predatory publishers” are those companies that publish “predatory journals”. As a rule, articles by these publishers are published in the open access mode. The criteria by which scientific publications are classified as “predatory” are considered. It is emphasized that the “charging” nature of the publication does not necessarily make it “predatory”, but creates a situation in which the publisher using the “gold” open access is almost always interested in the maximum number of published works with a significant reduction in the quality requirements for manuscripts sent to the editorial office. The situation with the Jeffrey Beall’s list is briefly considered – the history of its appearance, the criteria for including publishers and some individual journals in it, possible reasons for the abolition, access to the list today. The possible reasons are analyzed why scientists publish in paid journals instead of submitting their articles to free subscription editions, the rating of which, as a rule, is even higher. Considerations of the authors of this article regarding the clear non-obviousness of the advantages of publications in the open access mode for a lot of money are outlined. The current situation with the MDPI publisher, which is very popular among modern scientists and which Jeffrey Bill (and not only him) nevertheless refers to as “predatory” is considered in detail. It is emphasized that the established principles of the existence of “predatory journals” primarily satisfy the authors of the articles themselves, who are attracted by both the speed and the “high guarantee” of the publication process.

show abstract

Section: S43unclassified

Herbivore journals vs predatory journals – the battle is already lost, what’s next?

Хохлов

Моргунова

2022

Naučnyj redaktor i izdatelʹ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Серия 16. Биология» (Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin) [26][27][28], занимать менее 3-4 недель и достаточно часто может потребовать вплоть до 2-3 месяцев кропотливой работы. Очень трудно понять, как можно осуществить адекватное слепое рецензирование 18 000 статей в год (если, конечно, в издательстве не работает несколько тысяч квалифицированных сотрудников)!…”

Section: плата за публикацию статьиunclassified

Scientific publications – the bad, the good, for a fistful of dollars

Хохлов

Моргунова

2021

Naučn. red. izd.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the problem of assessing the quality of scientific publications. It is emphasized that the formal ranking of an article is currently determined, as a rule, not so much by the data obtained or formulated concepts, as by the scientometric indicators of the corresponding journals. Approaches to determining the ranking of an article based on the analysis of its citation (impact factor and its analogues) and the number of mentions in social networks (so called altmetrics), as well as the number of downloads of the paper from the publisher’s website are considered. The authors emphasize the significant role of the appearance of author-paid articles in the current change in the situation with scientific publications. It is assumed that the thorough commercialization of the process of publishing their works by scientists has led to a serious deterioration in their scientific component due to the reducing requirements for the format and content of manuscripts sent to the editors of paid journals. The authors express the hope that the “informal” approach to the evaluation of scientific articles, which is based on their content, but not the ratings of the editions that published these works, has not lost its relevance even at the present stage.

show abstract

“…The refusal in the hot water supply system is higher than in the cold water supply system. The presence of probabilistic works complicates the maintenance and requires the optimization of the structural scheme of the managing organization on the basis of the theory of mass service [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling work of the dispatching service of high-rise building as queuing system

Dement'eva

Dement’eva

2018

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The article presents the results of calculating the performance indicators of the dispatcher service of a high-rise building as a queuing system with an unlimited queue. The calculation was carried out for three models: with a single control room and brigade of service, with a single control room and a specialized service, with several dispatch centers and specialized services. The aim of the work was to investigate the influence of the structural scheme of the organization of the dispatcher service of a high-rise building on the amount of operating costs and the time of processing and fulfilling applications. The problems of high-rise construction and their impact on the complication of exploitation are analyzed. The composition of exploitation activities of high-rise buildings is analyzed. The relevance of the study is justified by the need to review the role of dispatch services in the structure of management of the quality of buildings. Dispatching service from the lower level of management of individual engineering systems becomes the main link in the centralized automated management of the exploitation of high-rise buildings. With the transition to market relations, the criterion of profitability at the organization of the dispatching service becomes one of the main parameters of the effectiveness of its work. A mathematical model for assessing the efficiency of the dispatching service on a set of quality of service indicators is proposed. The structure of operating costs is presented. The algorithm of decision-making is given when choosing the optimal structural scheme of the dispatching service of a high-rise building.

show abstract

Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin—a new era of evolution (2007–2013)

Cited by 5 publications

References 35 publications

Herbivore journals vs predatory journals – the battle is already lost, what’s next?

Herbivore journals vs predatory journals – the battle is already lost, what’s next?

Scientific publications – the bad, the good, for a fistful of dollars

Modeling work of the dispatching service of high-rise building as queuing system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About