1970
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(70)90194-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mössbauer effect studies of chemisorption: Titration of surfaces of iron catalysts with polar molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dust was gravimetrically separated into three fractions as indicated; the iron metal appears in the light fraction because it is associated with a low-density glass phase. [ (7), the details of the adsorption of atoms on active surfaces (8), the chemical makeup of corrosion products at a metal surface (9), or the intermediates produced in a chemical transformation taking place in a solid (10). Under favorable conditions, intermediate products can be identified on the basis of a comparison of their hyperfine spectra with those of known compounds.…”
Section: The Mossbauer Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dust was gravimetrically separated into three fractions as indicated; the iron metal appears in the light fraction because it is associated with a low-density glass phase. [ (7), the details of the adsorption of atoms on active surfaces (8), the chemical makeup of corrosion products at a metal surface (9), or the intermediates produced in a chemical transformation taking place in a solid (10). Under favorable conditions, intermediate products can be identified on the basis of a comparison of their hyperfine spectra with those of known compounds.…”
Section: The Mossbauer Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20. The use of signs and cue marks with notations is common in the historical period (8)(9)(10)(11) and has been extensively documented for the Upper Paleolithic in (4) and (5). 21.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the common oxidic supports silica and alumina it is difficult to prevent reaction of the iron(II), which is initially produced during reduction, with the support to iron(II) silicate or iron(II) aluminate. As both iron(II) silicate and iron(II) aluminate are very difficult to reduce [6][7][8][9][10][11], silica and alumina are not very suitable as support for iron-based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Zirconia does not form bulk iron(II) zirconate, although the interaction with iron oxide is sufficient [12][13][14][15][16] to anchor supported metallic iron particles through an intermediate very thin iron oxide layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Mössbauer measurements reveal the presence of high spin Fe 2+ species with quadrupole splittings at room temperature (2.7-1.7 mm/s) significantly higher than for bulk FeO (about 0.55 mm/s). These results point to the formation of ferrous species due to an intimate interaction with the support [9][10][11][13][14][15]18,[20][21][22][23][24]. One of the two iron(II) species is identified as a Fe 2+ which upon formation immediately migrates into the zirconia support to form a mixed oxide.…”
Section: Reduction and Reduction Model Of Fe/zromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For iron catalysts supported on Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 the formation of ferrous aluminates and silicates has been reported [18,[20][21][22][23][24]. Wielers et al [21] observed the formation of a silicate layer during reduction of trivalent iron indicating that, as soon as divalent iron is formed, iron migrates into the support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%