Most Cited Health Education Journal Articles, 1990–1997

Abstract

Аннотация. В статье представлены результаты медико-социологического исследования качества жизни военных пенсионеров в зависимости от социальных факторов: возраста, семейного статуса, характера трудовой занятости, звания при прохождении воинской службы, а также медицинских факторов: частоты острых респираторных ин-фекций в год. Проведен сравнительный анализ показателей качества жизни военных и не военных пенсионеров. Для определения был использован русскоязычный аналог международного опросника изучения качества жизни «SF-36 Health status survey». Результаты исследования можно использовать для разработки комплексных про-грамм и мер по медико-социальной адаптации данной категории граждан. Ключевые слова: военные пенсионеры, качество жизни, острые респираторные инфекции, профилактика, адап-тация, трудовая занятость. Annotation. The article presents the results of medical and sociological studies of quality of life of military retirees, depending on the social factors: age, marital status, nature of employment, rank at the military service, as well as medical factors: the frequency of acute respiratory infections per year. In addition, the comparative analysis of the quality of life of military and non-military retirees has been carried out. The Russian Federation-speaking analogue of international questionnaire «SF-36 Health status survey» of studying of quality of life has been used for definition. The results of the study can be used for the development of comprehensive programs of medical social adaptation of this category of citizens.

Influential Publications in Social Work Discourse: The 100 Most Highly Cited Articles in Disciplinary Journals: 2000-09

“…A number of literature reviews were also highly cited. This is consistent with findings in other disciplines (Jones et al, 1998;Price & Dake, 2001;Terajima & Aneman, 2003). Authoritative reviews and meta-analyses are often highly cited relative to other types of scholarship (Leydesdorff, 2008;Seglen, 1997).…”

“…The findings suggest a number of implications for scholars, educators, students, and practitioners (Price & Dake, 2001). Scholars seeking publication outlets that might enhance the probability of their work being cited might target journals that disproportionately publish highly cited work (Green, 2008;Seipel, 2003).…”

“…[Place Table 1 about here] Ordering the results requires a choice between two approaches. One method is to simply compute the total citation counts over a given citation window (Jones et al, 1998;Price & Dake, 2001). Alternatively, it is also possible to calculate the number of citations per year and then rank order the results accordingly (Keloharju, 2008).…”

“…Identifying the papers that have made the most impact helps in the process of professional self-reflection (Jones, Ripley, Kurusu & Worthington, 1998). Seminal works can be identified and built upon, gaps in the knowledge base can be determined, and future priorities mapped (Fan & McGhee, 2008;Price & Dake, 2001).…”

“…The results were re-ordered and the top 100 most cited articles were selected. Although smaller(Price & Dake, 2001) and larger(Keloharju, 2008) compilations have appeared in the literature, sets of 100 articles have been commonly reported(Baltussen & Kindler, 2004a;Ohba et al, 2007;Paladugu et al, 2002).ResultsTable 1 depicts the 100 most influential articles published in disciplinary social work journals over the course of the past decade. Put differently, the table features the most cited articles during 2000-2009, that were initially published during 2000-2009.…”