1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.57.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Most probable charge of fission products in 24 MeV proton induced fission of238U

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the γ -spectroscopy data no corrections due to contributions from the precursors were applied since these are considered insignificant, taking into account the yield of the fission products as reported in [11]. The result from June 2013 has the largest uncertainty, but it is discarded since the spectrum was distorted by impurities of non identified elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the γ -spectroscopy data no corrections due to contributions from the precursors were applied since these are considered insignificant, taking into account the yield of the fission products as reported in [11]. The result from June 2013 has the largest uncertainty, but it is discarded since the spectrum was distorted by impurities of non identified elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectroscopic analysis of induced activity is not generally provided with data on several isobars required for determination of necessary parameters. As in previous publications [20,21], in the present work several assumptions on the basis of results of earlier measurements and the empiric applications were made. The first assumption relates to the slow dependence of the parameter of charge distribution widths (C) on the product charge number (Z) for the regions with close mass numbers.…”
Section: Fissionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The bell shaped distribution obtained in (60-160) atomic mass range (Figure 1) is considered as a binary mode of fission of 220 Ra compound nucleus. The fission cross section was calculated based generally on the assumption of Gaussian function form for the fragment charge and mass distributions [20,21]. The cross section of independently produced fission fragments σ (A, Z) can be presented as Gaussian Z-distribution curve at given A-value:…”
Section: Fissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other systematic uncertainties that might affect the measurement concern the overall transport efficiency of IGISOL, which can be regarded as the product of the physical transport efficiency p and the chemical transport efficiency c [71]. The former depends on the operating conditions of the mass separator, while the latter depends on the chemical properties of the elements.…”
Section: E Sources Of Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%