2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-015-2425-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mother–Child Interaction as a Window to a Unique Social Phenotype in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome and in Williams Syndrome

Abstract: Mother-child interactions in 22q11.2 Deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) and Williams syndrome (WS) were coded for maternal sensitivity/intrusiveness, child's expression of affect, levels of engagement, and dyadic reciprocity. WS children were found to express more positive emotions towards their mothers compared to 22q11.2DS children and those with developmental delay in a conflict interaction. During the same interaction, dyads of 22q11.2DS children were characterized by higher levels of maternal intrusiveness, lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CIB has shown construct and predictive validity, test–retest reliability and sensitivity to cultural contexts, interacting partner, and multiple psychopathological conditions (for a review see Feldman, 2012b). Consistent with prior research, we used three CIB constructs; Reciprocity, Empathy and Withdrawal (Feldman et al , 2013b, 2014; Schneiderman et al , 2014; Weisman et al , 2015; Apter-Levi et al , 2016), each computed by averaging several CIB codes. The Reciprocity composite included the following codes: recognition, elaboration, affect synchrony, containment, constancy, warmth and support.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CIB has shown construct and predictive validity, test–retest reliability and sensitivity to cultural contexts, interacting partner, and multiple psychopathological conditions (for a review see Feldman, 2012b). Consistent with prior research, we used three CIB constructs; Reciprocity, Empathy and Withdrawal (Feldman et al , 2013b, 2014; Schneiderman et al , 2014; Weisman et al , 2015; Apter-Levi et al , 2016), each computed by averaging several CIB codes. The Reciprocity composite included the following codes: recognition, elaboration, affect synchrony, containment, constancy, warmth and support.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, children at risk or with ASD show reduced preference for infantdirected speech (Watson et al, 2012), this impacting negatively on language skills at later ages (Nadig et al, 2007;Paul et al, 2007;Watson et al, 2010). Evidence about WS children is not available, but compared to children with 22q11.2 Deletion syndrome, who commonly exhibit autistic features (Ousley et al, 2017), they express more positive emotions towards their mothers in a conflict interaction, higher levels of child's engagement, and enhanced reciprocity (Weisman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ws Domestication and Language Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both syndromes have overlapping phenotypic manifestations, including cardiovascular anomalies, calcium dysregulation, cognitive deficits and high rates of psychiatric comorbidities (Campbell et al, 2009). As a group, individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities (e.g., 22q11DS, WS, fragile X, or Turner syndrome) have higher rates of neuropsychiatric, cognitive and social-behavioral deficits including nonverbal learning disorder, visuospatial deficits, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders and affective disorders, compared to typically developing (TD) individuals (Schneider et al, 2014; Siegel and Smith, 2011; Weisman et al, 2015; Zarchi et al, 2014). Additionally, individuals with 22q11.2DS have a 30-fold increased risk of developing psychosis compared to TD individuals and individuals with other neurodevelopmental disabilities (10-fold) (Schneider et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%