1999
DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0902_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mother God, Father God: Children's Perceptions of God's Distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this conclusion is not restricted to people's explicit self-reports or to situations in which they are consciously aware of the source of distress and may control their responses accordingly. For example, using a semiprojective methodology, researchers have consistently found that from kindergarten age onward, children place a God symbol closer to a fictional child when the fictional child is in attachment-activating situations than when he or she is in attachment-neutral situations (Cassibba, Granqvist & Costantini, in press; Eshleman, Dickie, Merasco, Shephard, & Johnson, 1999; Granqvist, Ljungdahl, & Dickie, 2007). In addition, experiments with adult theists have observed an increase in their wish to be close to God following priming with subliminal separation threats targeting their relationship with their mother or with God, which does not happen to participants in attachment-neutral control conditions (Birgegard & Granqvist, 2004).…”
Section: Attachment and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this conclusion is not restricted to people's explicit self-reports or to situations in which they are consciously aware of the source of distress and may control their responses accordingly. For example, using a semiprojective methodology, researchers have consistently found that from kindergarten age onward, children place a God symbol closer to a fictional child when the fictional child is in attachment-activating situations than when he or she is in attachment-neutral situations (Cassibba, Granqvist & Costantini, in press; Eshleman, Dickie, Merasco, Shephard, & Johnson, 1999; Granqvist, Ljungdahl, & Dickie, 2007). In addition, experiments with adult theists have observed an increase in their wish to be close to God following priming with subliminal separation threats targeting their relationship with their mother or with God, which does not happen to participants in attachment-neutral control conditions (Birgegard & Granqvist, 2004).…”
Section: Attachment and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Eshleman et al (1999) study of children, girls felt closer to God if God was perceived as female, and not male, while boys felt closer to God if God was perceived as male. However, heterosexual young adults, who have shifted their attachments from same-sex parents to the other gender, may not show this same pattern.…”
Section: Gender and Closeness To Godmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, people's beliefs about God and the Devil may be related to a variety of other aspects of their lives. For example, research suggests that how people conceptualize God relates to their attachment to primary caregivers (Dickie et al 1997, 2006; Eshleman et al 1999; Granqvist 2006; Granqvist and Dickie 2006; Granqvist et al 2007; Kirkpatrick 1997, 2005; Kirkpatrick and Shaver 1990), and may also relate to coping style (Maynard, Gorsuch, and Bjorck 2001), willingness to seek mental health services (Matlock‐Hetzel 2005), self‐esteem (Benson and Spilka 1973), political outlook (Lakoff 1996), and moral reasoning (Jensen 1997, 2008a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%