2007
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arm026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mothers adjust egg size to helper number in a cooperatively breeding cichlid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
104
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
14
104
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Heg et al 2005), although on average, the between-group distance in our main study population is 90 cm (Heg et al 2008). Previous studies have found positive effects of the presence of helpers of various sizes and sexes on the breeder's survival (Heg et al 2004a), egg production (Taborsky 1984) and offspring survival (Brouwer et al 2005) and negative effects on average egg mass (Taborsky et al 2007). Our study shows that the presence of a single, large female helper has a slightly, nonsignificant negative effect on clutch size and significantly increases egg mass (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heg et al 2005), although on average, the between-group distance in our main study population is 90 cm (Heg et al 2008). Previous studies have found positive effects of the presence of helpers of various sizes and sexes on the breeder's survival (Heg et al 2004a), egg production (Taborsky 1984) and offspring survival (Brouwer et al 2005) and negative effects on average egg mass (Taborsky et al 2007). Our study shows that the presence of a single, large female helper has a slightly, nonsignificant negative effect on clutch size and significantly increases egg mass (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Eggs with obvious abnormalities (clear cuticle or breakable) were collected and weighed separately and, since they were extraordinarily light, discarded from all analyses, leaving a total of 23,212 valid eggs. The total mass per dish was determined to the nearest 0.1 mg (Mettler AE100 balance) after 32 h drying in a stove at 70°C (measured once, dry eggs moved to a second dish and measured again and averaged to account for measurement errors; see also Taborsky et al 2007). The two dishes were weighed empty to the nearest 0.1 mg. Average egg mass was calculated as the (total mass minus mass of empty dish)/number of eggs per dish.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the genetic fitness of dominants should be largely independent of the degree of relatedness to subordinate helpers and hence their reproductive decisions should be unaffected by kinship. In contrast, helping to gain indirect benefits predicts that dominant females should base their reproductive effort on the degree of relatedness to their helpers: If kin-selection is primarily responsible for cooperation among the group members, related subordinates should be more helpful than unrelated ones, which would allow adaptive adjustment of reproduction of dominant females 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside of advanced insect-type systems (see above), we know of only one published study that has considered egg sizes in a cooperative fish (Taborsky et al 2007) and one in a cooperative bird (Russell et al 2007b). In the cichlid fish, N. pulcher, experimental increases in group size caused reductions in the size of eggs laid by the breeding female, but no change in clutch size.…”
Section: Maternal Effects As Confounds Of Fitness Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%