1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0882-5963(98)80050-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mothers' experiences caring for children with disabilities who require a gastrostomy tube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the ideal of meeting a child's feeding needs with ease is unattainable, a perception of inadequacy may arise [13]. Though only a small number of studies have evaluated parental experiences of managing enteral feeding at home, what emerged was that it was often associated with caregiver burden, perceptions of loss, and a greater degree of stress was experienced relative to that of mothers with children who had disabilities but who could still be fed orally [3,5,14]. The initial decision to have a gastrostomy tube inserted was found to be difficult for mothers to make, which was not necessarily made easier where oral feeding was challenging [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the ideal of meeting a child's feeding needs with ease is unattainable, a perception of inadequacy may arise [13]. Though only a small number of studies have evaluated parental experiences of managing enteral feeding at home, what emerged was that it was often associated with caregiver burden, perceptions of loss, and a greater degree of stress was experienced relative to that of mothers with children who had disabilities but who could still be fed orally [3,5,14]. The initial decision to have a gastrostomy tube inserted was found to be difficult for mothers to make, which was not necessarily made easier where oral feeding was challenging [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each study identified one or more functional impairments targeted by the assistive device: accessing a computer 43 (30); independent feeding 28 (n=1); living skills 42 (n=1); mobility [19][20][21]24,44,45,47,55,64 (n=9), modifying the environment 59 (n=1); nutrition 40,53,61,63 (n=4); and postural stability 33,34 (n=2). Details of the studies included are presented in Table III.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Research is needed to enhance the picture of how assistive devices can benefit a child, their family, and their social environments to help guide clinicians in day-to-day practice. 15,40,61,63 (Difficulty caregiving 61 ) Less concern 40 (Loss of social supports 61 ) Quality of life 40 (Loss of privacy 61 ) Decreased stress 61 (Disappointment 63 ) (See child as more different 61 ) Postural Stability Pelvic stabilizer 34 Ease in caregiving 34 Only outcomes identified as having a positive or negative impact on the caregiver were included in this table. Measured outcomes where no impact was identified are not reported here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations