1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19960520)50:4<392::aid-bit6>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motility behavior of hepatocytes on extracellular matrix substrata during aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that strong cell-ECM adhesion results in the formation of larger numbers of smaller aggregates, and increases the time taken for aggregates to form. Our results agree with experimental findings reported in Powers and Griffith-Cima (1996), that strong cell-substrate adhesion inhibits migration, and are consistent with the hypothesis that aggregates do not form when cell-ECM adhesions are stronger than cell contractile forces. When cell-ECM adhesion is extremely strong, we found cell movement was almost completely eliminated, which reproduces the experimental findings of Riccalton-Banks (2002) for cells seeded on tissue culture plastic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results show that strong cell-ECM adhesion results in the formation of larger numbers of smaller aggregates, and increases the time taken for aggregates to form. Our results agree with experimental findings reported in Powers and Griffith-Cima (1996), that strong cell-substrate adhesion inhibits migration, and are consistent with the hypothesis that aggregates do not form when cell-ECM adhesions are stronger than cell contractile forces. When cell-ECM adhesion is extremely strong, we found cell movement was almost completely eliminated, which reproduces the experimental findings of Riccalton-Banks (2002) for cells seeded on tissue culture plastic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is well known that both the strength of cell-ECM adhesion and the material properties of the ECM contribute significantly to cell mobility (Powers and Griffith-Cima, 1996;Thomas and DiMilla, 2000). Our results show that strong cell-ECM adhesion results in the formation of larger numbers of smaller aggregates, and increases the time taken for aggregates to form.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…62 In addition, although cellular response to RGD can depend on how the peptide is presented (e.g., clustering density 63 ), we have conjugated RGDS to 10% PEG-DA hepatocyte-laden hydrogels using the same copolymerization route in the past. 15 That RGDS was not necessary for optimal hepatocyte function in the present case may be due to cross-talk between cell-matrix and cellcell interaction pathways, [64][65][66] and suggests that cell-cell contacts established during the 2D phase of microtissue construction were sufficient to alleviate the need for any cell-matrix contacts in 3D, as the PEG hydrogel background is biologically inert. Alternatively, it is possible that despite collagenase digestion, secreted ECM molecules remain attached to hepatocytes and are subsequently immobilized during encapsulation.…”
Section: Characterization Of Microtissue Drug Metabolism Enzyme Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%