1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.00295.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motility of rhG‐CSF‐induced neutrophils in patients undergoing chemotherapy: evidence for inhibition detected by image analysis

Abstract: The motility of circulating neutrophils from seven patients affected by intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was investigated before and after rhG-CSF administration (5 micrograms/kg/d for 5 d subcutaneously) in the course of chemotherapy. Random motility and bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced chemotaxis were studied by the micropore filter technique in a Boyden chamber. These functions were evaluated by a very sensitive technique, based on a computer-assisted image processing system, capable o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of G-CSF on the random migration of neutrophils is controversial; random migration increases in vitro when neutrophils are stimulated by G-CSF, 36 whereas neutrophils obtained from G-CSF-treated patients with nonmyeloid malignancies show decreased random migration and chemotaxis. 37,38 Our in vitro experiment with PB-Neu(Gϩ)'s and PB-Neu(GϪ)'s replicated the former result. Nevertheless, hESCNeu's showed relatively low random migration despite stimulation with G-CSF, while maintaining almost normal fMLP-induced chemotaxis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The effect of G-CSF on the random migration of neutrophils is controversial; random migration increases in vitro when neutrophils are stimulated by G-CSF, 36 whereas neutrophils obtained from G-CSF-treated patients with nonmyeloid malignancies show decreased random migration and chemotaxis. 37,38 Our in vitro experiment with PB-Neu(Gϩ)'s and PB-Neu(GϪ)'s replicated the former result. Nevertheless, hESCNeu's showed relatively low random migration despite stimulation with G-CSF, while maintaining almost normal fMLP-induced chemotaxis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Single‐formulation studies evaluating the effect of lenograstim 9,10 or filgrastim 8,11 , 12 showed impaired chemotaxic activity of the granulocytes. Nevertheless, in a previous comparative study, 13 there was evidence that lenograstim affected chemotaxic properties less than filgrastim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence for differences between these three G‐CSF formulations in modifying neutrophil functions. Generally, chemotactic properties, which are essential for granulocyte function in host defense, are known to be impaired after treatment with G‐CSF 8‐12 . Azzara and coworkers 13 observed that filgrastim reduced chemotaxis more than lenograstim; recently published data attribute this reduced chemotaxis as well as morphological changes after filgrastim to cytoskeletal rearrangements 14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects include enhancement of adherence, phagocytosis, respiratory burst, and degranulation. Improvement in chemotaxis has been reported by some investigators, although the effect of rG-CSF on this function is unclear [43][44][45][46]. Improvement in other aspects of neutrophil function with rG-CSF administration have also been demonstrated in vitro.…”
Section: Role Of Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-csf) In Neumentioning
confidence: 91%