2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2010.5548000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion compensation for obstacle detection based on homography and odometric data with virtual camera perspectives

Abstract: In this paper we present a method to compensate the image motion of a monocular camera on a moving vehicle in order to detect obstacles. Due to the camera motion, the road surface induces a characteristic image motion between two camera shots. The motion of the camera is determined by the use of odometric data received from the CAN-bus, and the position and orientation of the road is continuously estimated with camera self-calibration. This all leads to a motion field which is predicted based on homography. To… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…INVERSE PERSPECTIVE MAPPING BASED COARSE DETECTION Stereo IPM has achieved good performance for obstacle detection [6] [7].The stereo IPM can keep the non-plane objects and remove the plane objects such as lane-markings, shadows by comparing the differences between the left and right remapped image [6]. For a single camera use IPM for obstacle detection, temporal frame difference is used to simulate the effects of stereo cameras [5][8][9] [10]. Single camera based IPM methods usually need car ego motion parameter to compensate the displacements between two frames to eliminate false positives [5] [10].…”
Section: A Single Camera Based Rear Obstacle Detection Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…INVERSE PERSPECTIVE MAPPING BASED COARSE DETECTION Stereo IPM has achieved good performance for obstacle detection [6] [7].The stereo IPM can keep the non-plane objects and remove the plane objects such as lane-markings, shadows by comparing the differences between the left and right remapped image [6]. For a single camera use IPM for obstacle detection, temporal frame difference is used to simulate the effects of stereo cameras [5][8][9] [10]. Single camera based IPM methods usually need car ego motion parameter to compensate the displacements between two frames to eliminate false positives [5] [10].…”
Section: A Single Camera Based Rear Obstacle Detection Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a single camera use IPM for obstacle detection, temporal frame difference is used to simulate the effects of stereo cameras [5][8][9] [10]. Single camera based IPM methods usually need car ego motion parameter to compensate the displacements between two frames to eliminate false positives [5] [10]. However, it is a complicated task to compute the car ego motion parameter accurately.…”
Section: A Single Camera Based Rear Obstacle Detection Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RELATED WORK Estimating motion with respect to the ground plane from monocular image sequences is a task frequently occurring in computer vision applications. For example, Kitt et al [7] use the relative motion with respect to the ground plane to compensate for scale drift in bundle adjustment and Miksch et al [8] present an approach for obstacle detection based on the ground plane. Stein et al [11] estimate velocity, pitch, and yaw using a direct image based method in a probabilistic framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important problem in FCW systems, vision-based vehicle detection for driver assistance has received considerable attention over the last 15 years [10]. And most recently, obstacle detection algorithms [11] and real applications, e.g. the car named Lexus LS430 1) , have made much headway along with the exponential growth in processor speeds and the advances on computer vision research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%