2019
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.5215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion data acquisition method for motion analysis in golf

Abstract: As golf becomes more popular, interest in the analysis and correction of golf swing postures increases. Thus, various methods for analyzing the golf swing have been studied. Methods have recently been extended to 3D analysis systems, using motion capture technology beyond 2D analysis using cameras. The inertial sensor is one of the sensors used in 3D analysis. It is mainly used in the motion capture system, because it is cheap and has negligible space limitations. However, the motion capture system using the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A motion capture system (Motion Analysis, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) with 11 Eagle digital cameras was used to capture reflective marker balls for three-dimensional marker tracking [28]. The sampling frequency was set at 200 Hz.…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A motion capture system (Motion Analysis, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) with 11 Eagle digital cameras was used to capture reflective marker balls for three-dimensional marker tracking [28]. The sampling frequency was set at 200 Hz.…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To consider these interesting and significant issues which have related to the fast developing area of smart media and application, the editors have edited this special issue Smart Media and Application , and finally, it selected eleven papers. In Motion data acquisition method for motion analysis in golf by Hwang et al, 1 it studied the process a system that obtains the same motion as the actual one by acquiring information on the motion of the subject using 15 inertial sensors, and using the information on the actual joint length and initial direction of the subject extracted from a depth camera. As a result, it shows that measurement error of information on the joint length and the foot stance of subjects extracted through the depth camera ranges from a minimum of 4.4% to a maximum of 6.94%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%