2014
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion, identity and the bias toward agency

Abstract: The well-documented human bias toward agency as a cause and therefore an explanation of observed events is typically attributed to evolutionary selection for a “social brain”. Based on a review of developmental and adult behavioral and neurocognitive data, it is argued that the bias toward agency is a result of the default human solution, developed during infancy, to the computational requirements of object re-identification over gaps in observation of more than a few seconds. If this model is correct, overrid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically infants perceive human action as volitional and intentional in nature, and are less likely to perceive the actions of non-human entities as intentional (Fields, 2014). Although it is possible that the infants in the present study interpreted the actions of the human hand, but not the mechanical hand, as intentional in nature we consider this explanation unlikely, for the following reason.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically infants perceive human action as volitional and intentional in nature, and are less likely to perceive the actions of non-human entities as intentional (Fields, 2014). Although it is possible that the infants in the present study interpreted the actions of the human hand, but not the mechanical hand, as intentional in nature we consider this explanation unlikely, for the following reason.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, with sufficient cues to establish goal intention, such as self-propulsion, clear action-effects, and equifiniality (Biro & Leslie, 2007; Király et al, 2003) or with experience with the claw (Boyer et al, 2011; Gerson & Woodward, 2012; Hofer et al, 2005) infants as young as 7 to 9 months will attribute goal-directedness to non-human agents. These and related findings suggest that infants have a bias to assign intentional agency to humans but not mechanical devices (Fields, 2014), a bias that is malleable with salient goal-related cues and motor experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Persistent objects are instances, first, of the types representing their visually-identified features. They are, second, classified automatically by threat detection, agency detection and animacy detection systems active beginning in early infancy (Fields, 2014); the presence of a face alone indicates agency to human infants. They are also classified, when possible, into entry-level and then more abstract cognitive categories, an ability also developed in infancy (Rakison and Yermoleva, 2010).…”
Section: From Object Files To Object Tokens and Object Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can hypothesize, therefore, that before 4 years of age, any causal models used to infer individual identity across feature changes or in the presence of identically featured competitors are based exclusively on causation by agents, and that even in older children, such identity-preservation models remain biased toward causation by agency. If this is the case, the human representation of individual identity over time is strongly developmentally coupled to the representation of agency, and may be expected to remain so throughout the lifespan (Fields 2014).…”
Section: Motion Detection Categorization and Causal Reasoning In Indmentioning
confidence: 99%