2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.77.043525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion of the acoustic peak in the correlation function

Abstract: The baryonic acoustic signature in the large-scale clustering pattern of galaxies has been detected in the twopoint correlation function. Its precise spatial scale has been forwarded as a rigid-rod ruler test for the spacetime geometry, and hence as a probe for tracking the evolution of dark energy. Percent-level shifts in the measured position can bias such a test and erode its power to constrain cosmology. This paper addresses some of the systematic effects that might induce shifts; namely, nonlinear correct… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
196
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(100 reference statements)
10
196
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal plan is then to fit that template to the data over a range of scales using the correct covariance matrix or likelihood. Some early works instead used non-parametric models for the acoustic peak, such as a Gaussian in configuration space or a damped sinusoid in Fourier space (Blake and Glazebrook, 2003), or simply identified the maximum of the correlation function (Guzik et al, 2007;Smith et al, 2008). We believe that, because the acoustic scale is predicted only in the context of an early universe model with parameters taken from fits to CMB data, there is no extra value in avoiding the linear-theory model predictions.…”
Section: Fitting To Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal plan is then to fit that template to the data over a range of scales using the correct covariance matrix or likelihood. Some early works instead used non-parametric models for the acoustic peak, such as a Gaussian in configuration space or a damped sinusoid in Fourier space (Blake and Glazebrook, 2003), or simply identified the maximum of the correlation function (Guzik et al, 2007;Smith et al, 2008). We believe that, because the acoustic scale is predicted only in the context of an early universe model with parameters taken from fits to CMB data, there is no extra value in avoiding the linear-theory model predictions.…”
Section: Fitting To Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible reason for this discrepancy could be that the 2-halo term in the redshift-space power spectrum only includes linear halo motions-nonlinear terms do contribute to this term (see [42,44,83]) and inclusion of these nonlinear corrections may help alleviate this problem. Another is that the concentration-mass relation, which is vital for getting the correct normalization of the halo density profiles, may not be sufficiently accurate.…”
Section: B Estimating the Power Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the observed galaxy clustering with that from underlying dark matter, one has to account for changes in the linear power spectrum (or correlation function) due to non-linear gravitational collapse and scale dependent bias of galaxies. Such effects introduce distortions on the linear power spectrum shape and can even shift the position of the acoustic peak of up to 3% (Smith et al 2008). Several models have been proposed to correct for these effects, usually supported by numerical simulations.…”
Section: Lss Analysis and Compressed Datamentioning
confidence: 99%