2018
DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lby054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion picture production incentives and filming location decisions: a discrete choice approach

Abstract: We use a discrete choice model to study the impact of tax incentives on firm location choices in situations involving heterogeneous geographic characteristics, heterogeneous firm preferences and large choice sets. We apply our model to investigate the impact of movie production incentives on filming location choices for movies produced from 1999 to 2013. We gather the characteristics of filming locations and use a machine-learning technique to define choice sets. We find production incentives can attract movie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis finds no link between incentives that promote in‐state filming and states' economic growth or level. The findings are not surprising given previous estimates of small and nonrobust effects of MPIs on the film industry (Button ; Owens and Rennhoff Forthcoming; Swenson ; Thom ). The empirical findings are also consistent with reports by state economic development agencies that have estimated weak financial returns to their film incentive programs (Christopherson and Rightor ).…”
Section: Policy Implications and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This analysis finds no link between incentives that promote in‐state filming and states' economic growth or level. The findings are not surprising given previous estimates of small and nonrobust effects of MPIs on the film industry (Button ; Owens and Rennhoff Forthcoming; Swenson ; Thom ). The empirical findings are also consistent with reports by state economic development agencies that have estimated weak financial returns to their film incentive programs (Christopherson and Rightor ).…”
Section: Policy Implications and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The author also finds nonrobust evidence of small employment effects, and that MPIs do not have a strong ability to develop a significant film industry. Owens and Rennhoff (Forthcoming) uses a discrete choice model to examine film location decisions and finds that film incentives can attract movies to states; however, the impact depends on the type of incentive, studio characteristics, and geography. Similar to Button (), MPIs are not associated with creating a more permanent film industry.…”
Section: Movie Production Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the multitude of state cost-benefit evaluations, a few independent academic studies have sought to quantify the effects of MPI programs by looking across, rather than within, adopting states. Like their cost-benefit counterparts, different conclusions were reached within this regression analysis group, with some having found negative impacts (Lester, 2013; Owens & Rennhoff, 2018), while others noted mixed or small positive effects (Adkisson, 2013; Button, 2018, 2019; Swenson, 2017; Thom, 2018a, 2019). Lester (2013) used a benefit-cost analysis of Canada’s MPI program and focused on real income per capita.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…He found that real incomes in Canada decreased by the equivalent of 96% of the tax revenue forgone by offering credits. Owens and Rennhoff (2018) used a discrete choice model to understand a production’s filming location decision. This approach essentially used propensity score matching on film locations to create comparison groups that were similar to each other on modeled characteristics, except for MPI status.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation