2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2019.8813832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion Planning for Collision Mitigation via FEM–Based Crash Severity Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first collision is determined at t c = 0.853s between the ego vehicle and the other vehicle (I), and the colliding trajectories are presented with black boxes in Fig. (11). The collision at this time for trajectory 291 is presented in more detail in the top right corner of this figure.…”
Section: B Multi-vehicle Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first collision is determined at t c = 0.853s between the ego vehicle and the other vehicle (I), and the colliding trajectories are presented with black boxes in Fig. (11). The collision at this time for trajectory 291 is presented in more detail in the top right corner of this figure.…”
Section: B Multi-vehicle Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crash severity is part of the formulation of the MPC cost function and is based on relative speed, relative heading angle and mass ratio between the vehicles. In [11], a crash severity map was developed by finite elements (FEM) simulations that aimed at identifying a crash configuration minimizing the crash severity. The method searches for a maneuver that leads to this crash configuration, which is determined by lateral offset and the relative heading angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the actuator limits of the experiment vehicle, a maximum front steering wheel angle is set as 25 °, maximum steering rate as 50°/s , maximum braking deceleration as -0.7g, and maximum acceleration as 0.5g. (10) The desired system outputs 𝒚 𝑑𝑒𝑠 are the lateral position 𝑦 𝑑𝑒𝑠 and the yaw angle 𝜃 𝑑𝑒𝑠 , i.e. 𝒚 𝑑𝑒𝑠 = [𝑦 𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝜃 𝑑𝑒𝑠 ] T .…”
Section: E Model Predictive Control (Mpc) For Path Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when it comes to evasive steering, since the vehicle direction and speed are both controlled within very strict constraints of time and space, the activation of AES functions is asking for a comprehensive and reliable algorithm of motion planning. On the other hand, most motion planning algorithms focus on how to avoid obstacles in potentially dangerous scenarios [1][2][3][4][5][6], while very few have contributed to how to reduce the crash injury in unavoidable collisions via motion planning [7][8][9][10][11]. For the example in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%