Volume 7B: Ocean Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1115/omae2018-77128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion Simulation Analysis of the Cable-Body of the Deep Underwater Towed System

Abstract: As the demand of marine resources is continuously growing, more and more people are focusing on the study of underwater towed system for marine survey, in which mastering and predicting the dynamic characteristic of the system is the key problem. Based on the parameters of a certain underwater system, combined with the lumped mass method, the underwater cable-body 3D motion mathematical model has been established by OrcaFlex, in which the variation of the tension of the towed cable and the variation of the dep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze the effect of the drag coefficients on the simulation results, four groups of drag coefficients are selected as F I G U R E 10 Plots of (A) side view of the steady-state positions with c t = 0.005 and variable c n , (B) steady-state internal tension distribution along the cable c t = 0.005, 0.011, 0.017, 0.023, and c n = 1.0, 1.3, 1.6, 1.9 based on the Reynold numbers of the cable. [39][40][41][42] The side view of the steady-state positions and the steady-state internal tension distribution along the cable for different drag coefficient scenarios are given in Figures 9 and 10.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Drag Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to analyze the effect of the drag coefficients on the simulation results, four groups of drag coefficients are selected as F I G U R E 10 Plots of (A) side view of the steady-state positions with c t = 0.005 and variable c n , (B) steady-state internal tension distribution along the cable c t = 0.005, 0.011, 0.017, 0.023, and c n = 1.0, 1.3, 1.6, 1.9 based on the Reynold numbers of the cable. [39][40][41][42] The side view of the steady-state positions and the steady-state internal tension distribution along the cable for different drag coefficient scenarios are given in Figures 9 and 10.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Drag Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four groups of cable mass densities are selected as 𝜇 = 0.82, 1.19, 1.58, and 1.83 kg/m. [39][40][41][42] The drag coefficients are set as c t = 0.005, c n = 1.0, and the simulation results are given as Figure 11. As 𝜇 increases from 0.82 to 1.83 kg/m, the vertical steady-state position of the system dropping from 18.87 to 26.94 m, while the maximum tension along the cable changes from 1210N to 1438N.…”
Section: Cable Mass Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%