2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2004.1326543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion vector processing for frame rate up conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Occlusion effects are handled by analyzing the forward and backwards motion fields in order to decide from which frame to interpolate. In (Dane and Nguyen, 2004) the authors conclude that the averaging technique is appropriate if forward and backward prediction errors are equal. In other cases, they conclude with theoretical results that the filter taps associated to the motion compensation have to be adapted to the reliability of the motion vectors.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occlusion effects are handled by analyzing the forward and backwards motion fields in order to decide from which frame to interpolate. In (Dane and Nguyen, 2004) the authors conclude that the averaging technique is appropriate if forward and backward prediction errors are equal. In other cases, they conclude with theoretical results that the filter taps associated to the motion compensation have to be adapted to the reliability of the motion vectors.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are computed according to (6), and R i+1 t (k, l) is computed according to (8). To make a decision whether the FRUC will be terminated in the current iteration, we compute the distortion of the interpolated pixels within the training windowsR t−1 andR t+1 between two successive iterations as well as the distortion between the actual and interpolated pixels within the training windowR t .…”
Section: Self-feedback Weight Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve such a problem, many motion vector postprocessing methods are proposed to smooth the motion field and improve the subjective perception [3], [7], [8]. What is more, for the areas with small objects, irregular shaped objects, and object boundaries, fixed size block MC usually does not work well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alparone et al proposed using Adaptively Weighted Vector Median Filter (AWVMF) based on prediction residues to obtain a smoother motion field [2]. Dane et al presented a method applying vector median and low pass filtering after MV classification based on the angle variance among its neighboring MVs [4]. In [6] This letter presents an edge-based approach for an MV smoothing method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%