2018
DOI: 10.4218/etrij.2017-0078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion-Vector Refinement for Video Error Concealment Using Downhill Simplex Approach

Abstract: In error-prone wireless environments, it is difficult to realize video coding systems that are robust to various types of data loss. In this paper, a novel motion-vector refinement approach is presented for video error concealment. A traditional boundarymatching approach is exploited to reduce blocky effects along the block boundary. More specifically, a downhill simplex approach is combined with a boundarymatching approach to fine-tune the motion vectors, reducing the blocky effects along the prediction unit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, blockiness as a result of this form of HEVC error concealment is still reported. Therefore, in [23] downhill Simplex optimization was applied at block boundaries to reduce blockiness and the computational overhead of the search, though it remains to be seen, as the computational overhead is unreported in [23], whether such a method is suitable for portable devices and that it is possible to avoid local minimums. Other forms of error concealment are reviewed in [23] but it is apparent from the discussion of HEVC motion copy concealment that the development of sufficient methods is complex and may face issues of computational overhead on portable devices with constrained battery consumption.…”
Section: Hevc Error Concealmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, blockiness as a result of this form of HEVC error concealment is still reported. Therefore, in [23] downhill Simplex optimization was applied at block boundaries to reduce blockiness and the computational overhead of the search, though it remains to be seen, as the computational overhead is unreported in [23], whether such a method is suitable for portable devices and that it is possible to avoid local minimums. Other forms of error concealment are reviewed in [23] but it is apparent from the discussion of HEVC motion copy concealment that the development of sufficient methods is complex and may face issues of computational overhead on portable devices with constrained battery consumption.…”
Section: Hevc Error Concealmentmentioning
confidence: 99%