Motivation (Constructs) Made Simpler: Adapting Self-Determination Theory for Community-Based Youth Development Programs

Abstract

Motivation is a key factor for enhancing psychological engagement among underserved youth. However, the abundance of motivational constructs complicates the translation of theory into practice by community-based youth development programs. This paper simplifies the translation process, presenting an actionable motivation model derived from Ryan and Deci’s (2000) self-determination theory (SDT) and its sub-construct, organismic integration theory (OIT). This model was developed by Youth Enrichment Services (YES), a Pittsburgh-based nonprofit that cultivates long-term relationships, academic and professional success, and community engagement among low-income, adolescent students of color. Although intrinsic motivation to learn is more positively associated with psychological engagement than extrinsic motivation, contemporary institutions are built around extrinsic incentives. Therefore, guided by OIT, this model cultivates the gradual internalization of motivational regulation by supporting youth’s psychological needs of relatedness, competences, and autonomy. As a practical application of self-determination theory, this model holds promise for adoption by other youth development programs.

Need for Relatedness and Eating Behaviour in Millennials

“…An important aspect is that the satisfaction generated from interacting with other individuals could increase or decrease over time (Yildiz & Kiliç, 2021). In this way, it is confirmed that the attitude towards behaviour, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control are influenced by the emotions resulting from interactions with others, especially regarding healthy eating behaviour (Baumeister & Leary, 1995;Jones et al, 2021).…”

Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions Through Autonomy, Relatedness, and Competency: A Study Among State Undergraduate Students in Sri Lanka

“…According to Ertac & Tanova (2020), SDT is a far-reaching theory of motivation that includes several sub-theories. Self-determination theory provides a background for human motivation founded on the knowledge that when people's inherent psychological needs of relatedness, autonomy, and competence are developed to challenge themselves, their motivation to explore and master new skills can be enhanced (Jones et al, 2021) In opposition to other needs theories, in the SDT, competence, autonomy, and relatedness do not vary by the extent to which individuals possess them but by the degree to which the environment facilitates their satisfaction or frustration (Vansteenkiste et al, 2020). According to SDT, the three needs that can influence behavior is the environments that help the needs build autonomous and intrinsic types of motivation, consequently improving desired behaviors (Deci & Ryan, 2008).…”

Self-determination theory and its predictors for sharing knowledge: a critical review

“…SDT draws on controllable external motivators provided by the organization, individuals’ autonomous intrinsic motivators and amotivation to identify what drives behavior (Deci and Ryan, 2012). The SDT framework describes how individuals can become motivated when their innate needs are met and the objective at hand is both relevant and achievable (Jones et al , 2021). The taxonomy of motivation as presented by SDT identifies various regulatory styles, their associated processes and their perceived locus of causality (Deci and Ryan, 2000a).…”