2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivation outweighs ability in explaining European consumers’ use of health claims

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared standardized regression weights between the two models. None of the differences exceeds .20, again indicating that common method bias is not a problem in these data (Hung et al, 2017).…”
Section: Common Methods Biasmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We compared standardized regression weights between the two models. None of the differences exceeds .20, again indicating that common method bias is not a problem in these data (Hung et al, 2017).…”
Section: Common Methods Biasmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…While some research has shown that it may facilitate label use by increasing its perceived benefits and by increasing its efficiency (Drichoutis, Lazaridis, & Nayga, 2006), other studies reported that nutrition knowledge has no significant effect on consumers' use of nutrition information on food labels, but is rather explained by a person's interest in healthy eating (Grunert, Wills et al, 2010) and personal motivation rather than knowledge-based personal ability to process such information (Hung, Grunert, Hoefkens, Hieke, & Verbeke, 2017).…”
Section: Motivation For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health claims inform consumers that a relationship exists between a food or one of its constituents and health, while the reduction of disease health claims inform consumers that the consumption of a food or one of its constituents reduces a risk factor in the development of a human disease. To be included in the community list of permitted health claims, claims must be based on generally accepted scientific evidence and well understood by the average consumer [1][2][3]. The scientific substantiation of health claims (articles 13 and 14) is a challenging and long process because it requires a substantial effort in terms of financial and human resources on behalf of the food industry to get these claims approved by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%