Motivational Crowding in Sustainable Development Interventions

Abstract

We used a quasi-experimental research design to study the extent of motivational crowding in a recent sustainable development intervention in northern India. The project provided participants with both private and communal material benefits to enhance their incomes, and environmental and social information to inculcate pro-environmental motivations. We compared changes in reported motivations of participants for conserving forest resources, before and after project implementation, with changes in reported motivations of matched nonparticipants. We found that villagers who received private economic benefits were more likely to change from an environmental to an economic motivation for forest protection, whereas those who engaged in communal activities related to the project were less likely to change from an environmental to an economic motivation. These results, which indicate a substantial but conditional degree of motivational crowding, clarify the relationships between institutional change, incentives, and motivations and have important implications for the design of sustainable development interventions.

Analyzing multilevel governance in Mexico: Lessons for REDD+ from a study of land-use change and benefit sharing in Chiapas and Yucatán

“…However, as the director of an NGO working in this region said: "The problem with CONAFOR-PES is that it can turn the forest into a hostage." In interviews with beneficiaries, they frequently mentioned the possibility of "inevitably" having to cut down the forest currently receiving PES if the 5-year contract were not to be renewed by CONAFOR (see Agrawal et al 2015). For example, an ejido leader in Maravilla Tenejapa commented:…”

Beyond Rewards and Punishments in the Brazilian Amazon: Practical Implications of the REDD+ Discourse

“…Anderson [51] and Sandel [52], for instance, highlight that "any attempt to commodify a good may corrupt it" and "can even make its very existence impossible." Indeed, research in areas like behavioral economics undermines the idea of a simplistic rational subject, pointing to the possibility of motivational crowding whereby material incentives for socially or environmentally desirable actions may have the effect of undermining and reducing the incidence of such actions [53]. The use of economic incentives for forest conservation has been supported since the late 1990s in a number of international and national contexts (e.g., Convention on Biological Diversity; United Nations Environment Programme; and the Sloping Lands Conservation Program in China).…”

A Crystal Ball for Forests?: Analyzing the Social-Ecological Impacts of Forest Conservation and Management over the Long Term

“…Socioeconomic fi ssures within communities and a quest for wage generation may also dilute the useful benefi ts or pro-forest attitudes thought to be obtained from sui generis community participation in local resource management (Baviskar 2004;Rangan 1997). Recent quantitative evidence from the region also suggests that external payment for participation may crowd out more intrinsic motivations to conserve forest resources (Agrawal et al 2015). Other, more critical studies (e.g., Nayak and Berkes 2008) suggest that community forest management (CFM) in some villages may have detrimental eff ects on neighboring villages because of decline in resource availability.…”