2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational interviewing adherence tools: A scoping review investigating content validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the suboptimal levels of MI treatment integrity for some aspects as shown by our assessment study [19]. Hence, it needs to be noted that several other studies have shown no relation between a higher competence level of the MI interventionist and better study outcomes, e.g., [53,54,60]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This may be due to the suboptimal levels of MI treatment integrity for some aspects as shown by our assessment study [19]. Hence, it needs to be noted that several other studies have shown no relation between a higher competence level of the MI interventionist and better study outcomes, e.g., [53,54,60]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Following recommendations by Mokkenstorm et al ( 7 ), both the behavior of the counselor and the reactions by the visitor were coded. This study used the MI-SCOPE ( 38 ), which covers more aspects of MI than other instruments and is more time-efficient than some of the other instruments ( 39 ). Five indices of treatment integrity can be extracted from the MI-SCOPE: the percentage of MI-consistent responses, the percentage of open questions, the percentage of complex reflections, the reflection-to-question ratio and the proportion of change talk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face validity aimed to inspecting the items to determine whether the tools measure what supposed to measure. Content validity was conducted to determine whether the tools cover the aim of the study (Lundahl et al, 2019). Validity was tested through a jury of (7) experts from medical surgical and critical care nursing department at faculty of nursing, Ain Shams University.…”
Section: Testing Validity and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%