2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational Orientation and EFL Learning: A Study of Iranian Undergraduate Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the study found that students were highly motivated to learn Mandarin as a foreign language. Specifically, they had both high level of integrative and instrumental motivations in learning a foreign language which concurs with the findings of Ainol & Isarji (2009); Gonzales (2010); Choubsaz & Choubsaz (2014); Khong, Hassan & Ramli (2017) and Chua & Mohammad Affiq (2019). This finding reaffirms/supports Brown's (2000) assertion that both integrative and instrumental motivations were not mutually exclusive in that learners rarely selected one form of motivation when learning a second or foreign language, but rather a combination of both orientations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the study found that students were highly motivated to learn Mandarin as a foreign language. Specifically, they had both high level of integrative and instrumental motivations in learning a foreign language which concurs with the findings of Ainol & Isarji (2009); Gonzales (2010); Choubsaz & Choubsaz (2014); Khong, Hassan & Ramli (2017) and Chua & Mohammad Affiq (2019). This finding reaffirms/supports Brown's (2000) assertion that both integrative and instrumental motivations were not mutually exclusive in that learners rarely selected one form of motivation when learning a second or foreign language, but rather a combination of both orientations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There are also studies that showed that integrative and instrumental motivations are equally important in learning foreign languages among undergraduates in Iran (Choubsaz & Choubsaz, 2014), in Malaysia (Chua & Affiq, 2019;Khong, Hassan & Ramli, 2017;Ainol & Isarji, 2009) and in the Philippines (Gonzales, 2010). This is congruent with Brown's (2000) contention that second or foreign learners are neither integratively nor instrumentally motivated but have a combination of both motivational orientations.…”
Section: Literature Review Motivations In Foreign Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Whilst Gardner clearly emphasised that orientation refers to the reason of studying an L2 and motivation is the driving force (Gardner & MacIntyre, 1991;Gardner & Tremblay, 1994), many studies using Gardner's concepts of integrative and instrumental notions have failed to see the difference between them. Such studies as those of Choubsaz and Choubsaz (2014), Samad, Etemadzadeh, and Far (2012), and Yu and Downing (2012), for examples, did treat orientation and motivation as the same entity, despite the fundamental difference between the two notions. Furthermore, the rise of Global English notion also contributes to the decreasing popularity of Gardner's concepts (Dornyei & Ushioda, 2011;Kachru & Nelson, 2006).…”
Section: Early Studies On Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A questionnaire study carried out with 129 Turkish university EFL learners highlighted the influence of student gender and level of study on their motivation to learn English as an L2 (Sakiroglu & Dikilitas, 2012). In their survey-based investigation of the motivation orientation of Iranian EFL undergraduate learners, Choubsaz and Choubsaz (2014) found that students tended to be instrumentally motivated to learn an L2 in educational settings. Another study examining the nature of university EFL learners' motivation in the Vietnamese context found that the learners not only displayed a positive attitude towards L2 learning but also exhibited extrinsic and intrinsic motivation towards learning English (Tuan, 2012).…”
Section: Factor 4: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the year of publication for each study, Table 2 shows an increasing interest in psychological factors influencing EFL learning. (Chiu & Wong, 2018;Gan, 2009;Liu & Ni, 2015;Miao & Vibulphol, 2021;Qiu & Lee, 2020;Xu, Fan & Luo 2020;Yan & Horowitz, 2008) Hungary (Tilfarlioğlu & Cğnkara, 2009;Tóth, 2007) Article DOI: 10.52589/BJELDP-40FWSI7U DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.52589/BJELDP-40FWSI7U www.abjournals.org Iran (Ali, Shamsan & Guduru et al, 2019;Chalak & Kassaian, 2010;Choubsaz & Choubsaz, 2014;Fathi, Derakhshan & Torabi, 2020;Golparvar & Khafi, 2021;Masyhur, Mohd, Yasin & Yunus, 2018;Roshandel, Ghonsooly & Ghanizadeh, 2018;Soleimani & Hanafi, 2013;Zare & Riasti, 2012) Indonesia (Mbato & Kharismawan, 2018) Japan (Andrade & Williams, 2009;Fuji, 2018;Leeming, 2017;Tanakaa & Ellis, 2016) Jordan (Al-Sawalha, 2016) Korean (Chae, 2013;Gan, 2009;Kim, 2011;Lee & Lo, 2017) Lebanon (Bahous, Bacha & Nabhani, 2011) Malaysia (Ahmed, 2015;Masyhur, Mohd, Yasin & Yunus, 2018) Saudi Arabia (Abu-Snoubar, 2017;Alkaff, 2013;Alkhalaf, 2020;Almutlaq & Etherington;Al-Shehri, 2018) Taiwan (Cheng, Horwitz & Schallert, 1999) Thailan...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%