2017
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2016.0224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivations for Botanical Use by Socioeconomically Diverse, Urban Adults: Does Evidence Support Motivation?

Abstract: To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to report a better quality diet with BDS use for a racially diverse urban population. Yet, improvement in diet is needed because overall quality did not achieve current recommendations. To improve overall health, it may be beneficial for this population to focus on dietary modifications to reduce the risks associated with chronic diseases. In general, the reported motivations for BS use were not supported by clinical evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixth, the REALM may not assess all aspects of health literacy, such as comprehension of printed material and information seeking (Dumenci et al, 2013), which may limit the generalizability of our findings. The strengths of our study include the sizable racially and socioeconomically diverse sample of adults; the assessment of DASH scores quantitatively using the Mellen formula (Mellen et al, 2008); the inclusion of dietary supplement data, particularly given their use being more common among people with higher literacy and educational attainment (Duffy et al, 2017); and the examination of health numeracy in addition to health literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixth, the REALM may not assess all aspects of health literacy, such as comprehension of printed material and information seeking (Dumenci et al, 2013), which may limit the generalizability of our findings. The strengths of our study include the sizable racially and socioeconomically diverse sample of adults; the assessment of DASH scores quantitatively using the Mellen formula (Mellen et al, 2008); the inclusion of dietary supplement data, particularly given their use being more common among people with higher literacy and educational attainment (Duffy et al, 2017); and the examination of health numeracy in addition to health literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMP is not part of conventional or western medicine but is categorized as a Complementary health Approaches (CHA). HMP is frequently used to prevent illness or maintain health rather than to treat illnesses (Craft et al, 2015;Duffy et al, 2017). HMP is the most commonly used CHA in many countries such as the United Kingdom (Posadzki et al, 2013), Taiwan (Chang, Liu, & Chen, 2014), and Malaysia (IPH, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%