2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40822-017-0087-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motives behind voting and the perception of the motives: paradox of voting in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not to say survey researches have ignored expressive choice. One method is to ask voters directly whether they vote to express their political views (Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman 2010;Krajina and Prochazka 2017). However, this has the limitation for the analysis of voter turnout since, whilst it is possible to ask voters why they voted or intend to vote, it makes little sense to ask this of non-voter.…”
Section: Survey Measures Of Expressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to say survey researches have ignored expressive choice. One method is to ask voters directly whether they vote to express their political views (Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman 2010;Krajina and Prochazka 2017). However, this has the limitation for the analysis of voter turnout since, whilst it is possible to ask voters why they voted or intend to vote, it makes little sense to ask this of non-voter.…”
Section: Survey Measures Of Expressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, as Copeland and Laband (2002) and many others noted, the ensuing prediction of overspread abstention is systematically contradicted by medium to high levels of electoral participation. This mismatch between the prediction of generalised abstention and actual turnout figures is known as the “paradox of not voting” or the “paradox of voting” (Ferejohn and Fiorina, 1974; Krajina and Prochazka, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%