“…Average dendritic length per labeled motoneuron was estimated by summing the measured dendritic lengths of the series of sections, multiplying by three to correct for sampling, then dividing by the total number of labeled motoneurons in that series. This method does not attempt to assess the actual total dendritic length of labeled motoneurons (Kurz et al, 1991), but has been shown to be a sensitive and reliable indicator of changes in dendritic morphology in normal development (Goldstein et al, 1993; Goldstein et al, 1990; Goldstein and Sengelaub, 1993), in response to hormonal manipulation (Burke et al, 1999; Burke et al, 1997; Forger and Breedlove, 1987; Goldstein et al, 1990; Goldstein and Sengelaub, 1993; Goldstein and Sengelaub, 1994; Hebbeler and Sengelaub, 2003; Hebbeler et al, 2001; Hebbeler et al, 2002; Kurz et al, 1991; Kurz et al, 1986), after changes in dendritic interactions (Goldstein et al, 1993) and afferent input (Hebbeler and Sengelaub, 2003; Hebbeler et al, 2002; Kalb, 1994), and after the death of nearby motoneurons (Fargo and Sengelaub, 2004a,b, 2007). …”