2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor-cognitive intervention concepts can improve gait in chronic stroke, but their effect on cognitive functions is unclear: A systematic review with meta-analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These desired characteristics were echoed by participants in the current study, who indicated that they would have liked for the robot to have the following attributes and functions: mobility; ease of operation; instructions written in large lettering; a loud voice and repetition of instructions with suitable intonation to emphasize parts of the sentence; adjustments to different levels of difficulty; capacity for longer response times by the user; and practice for language and communication impairments (speech, reading, and writing), cognition, memory, social contexts (like reading books) and other motor impairments specific to their injuries (such as hemispatial neglect). This expectation for a multi-modal assistive device echoes studies that show that a combined approach improves function—e.g., in upper-limb function ( 71 ) and in gait parameters ( 72 ) post-stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These desired characteristics were echoed by participants in the current study, who indicated that they would have liked for the robot to have the following attributes and functions: mobility; ease of operation; instructions written in large lettering; a loud voice and repetition of instructions with suitable intonation to emphasize parts of the sentence; adjustments to different levels of difficulty; capacity for longer response times by the user; and practice for language and communication impairments (speech, reading, and writing), cognition, memory, social contexts (like reading books) and other motor impairments specific to their injuries (such as hemispatial neglect). This expectation for a multi-modal assistive device echoes studies that show that a combined approach improves function—e.g., in upper-limb function ( 71 ) and in gait parameters ( 72 ) post-stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learned non-use may occur as a result of neural shock, causing progressive underuse of the affected extremity [45,46]. Hemiparesis, or one-sided weakness, is a common post-stroke symptom that contributes to activity restriction and reduced quality of life [47]. Upper limb impairment, referred to as upper extremity hemiparesis, can lead to limited function, with only a small percentage of patients regaining full function after six months [48][49][50].…”
Section: Review Neural Changes and Disabilities After Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be categorized based on clinical features and the degree of injury (Figure 1) [31]. Rehabilitation involves repetitive, challenging, motivating, and intensive exercises with meaningful and realistic tasks to enhance its efficacy [31,47]. Studies have shown that early rehabilitation after stroke can augment the duration of neuroplasticity, promoting cortical reorganization and compensatory mechanisms for improved function [59][60][61].…”
Section: Post-stroke Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measuring gait control in these individuals, the WR may be a helpful parameter, as it adds valuable information regarding gait quality to clinical gait assessments such as gait speed ( Bogen et al, 2018 ). Nevertheless, the WR has so far rarely been measured in chronic stroke survivors ( Huber et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%