Motor consequences of experimentally induced limb pain: A systematic review

Abstract

Compelling evidence exists that pain may affect the motor system, but it is unclear if different sources of peripheral limb pain exert selective effects on motor control. This systematic review evaluates the effects of experimental (sub)cutaneous pain, joint pain, muscle pain and tendon pain on the motor system in healthy humans. The results show that pain affects many components of motor processing at various levels of the nervous system, but that the effects of pain are largely irrespective of its source. Pain is associated with inhibition of muscle activity in the (painful) agonist and its non‐painful antagonists and synergists, especially at higher intensities of muscle contraction. Despite the influence of pain on muscle activation, only subtle alterations were found in movement kinetics and kinematics. The performance of various motor tasks mostly remained unimpaired, presumably as a result of a redistribution of muscle activity, both within the (painful) agonist and among muscles involved in the task. At the most basic level of motor control, cutaneous pain caused amplification of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex, whereas insufficient evidence was found for systematic modulation of other spinal reflexes. At higher levels of motor control, pain was associated with decreased corticospinal excitability. Collectively, the findings show that short‐lasting experimentally induced limb pain may induce immediate changes at all levels of motor control, irrespective of the source of pain. These changes facilitate protective and compensatory motor behaviour, and are discussed with regard to pertinent models on the effects of pain on motor control.

Alterations in central motor representation increase over time in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy

“…Change in corticospinal excitability could be attributable to several causes. For example, patients with MSK disorders experienced pain for a prolonged period, and pain has been shown to exert an inhibitory effect over M1 (for reviews see (Farina et al, 2003;Mercier and Léonard, 2011;Bank et al, 2013)). It has recently been shown that even low pain levels are sufficient to induce such inhibition, and that the perceived pain level is not associated with the level of inhibition (Dubé and Mercier, 2011).…”

Pain and motor processing in the human cerebellum

“…3,28 While initially protecting an organism from harm, pain-related changes in movement can become maladaptive when they persist beyond recovery from the initial injury. 52 Pain-related adaptations in movement require a network architecture that allows for integration across pain and motor circuits.…”

A Preliminary Study Into the Effect of 2 Resistance Training Modes on Proprioception of Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis

“…Second, increases in muscle strength resulting from resistance training may attenuate the loading forces experienced through the joint with weight-bearing activities. With fewer forces being absorbed by the joint resulting in less pain, activation of the a-motor neuron may be more coordinated because of lack of inhibition from the joint pain receptors, 37 resulting in more effective functional movements.…”