2009
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor-induced Suppression of the Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Sensory responses to stimuli that are triggered by a self-initiated motor act are suppressed when compared with the response to the same stimuli triggered externally, a phenomenon referred to as motor-induced suppression (MIS) of sensory cortical feedback. Studies in the somatosensory system suggest that such suppression might be sensitive to delays between the motor act and the stimulus-onset, and a recent study in the auditory system suggests that such MIS develops rapidly. In three MEG experiments, we chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
172
6
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
25
172
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the relative insensitivity of MEG to non-superficial, non-tangential sources, attenuated N1m ERFs in contingent stimulation protocols are generally attributed to the attenuation of this N1 subcomponent (e.g. Aliu, Houde, & Nagarajan, 2009, Martikainen, et al, 2005. In the ERPs, a decreased positivity at the mastoid electrodes beside the decreased (less negative) fronto-central negativity is a good indicator that the experimental manipulation affected the supra-temporal component if the EEG was recorded with nose-reference.…”
Section: Typical Findings In the Contingent Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the relative insensitivity of MEG to non-superficial, non-tangential sources, attenuated N1m ERFs in contingent stimulation protocols are generally attributed to the attenuation of this N1 subcomponent (e.g. Aliu, Houde, & Nagarajan, 2009, Martikainen, et al, 2005. In the ERPs, a decreased positivity at the mastoid electrodes beside the decreased (less negative) fronto-central negativity is a good indicator that the experimental manipulation affected the supra-temporal component if the EEG was recorded with nose-reference.…”
Section: Typical Findings In the Contingent Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With enhanced skill, fewer neurons are recruited for the same movements, which show a decrease in movement variability, and less effort is necessary for their execution, allowing musicians to progressively dedicate their attention to artistic goals rather than sensorimotor ones (Krings et al 2000;Jancke et al 2000). Finally, internally generated movement deriving from a forward model gives rise to motor-induced suppression of sensory cortical feedback (Aliu et al 2009). …”
Section: Negative Effects Of Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first examines the neural activity leading up to a voluntary action representing the planning and preparatory activity before the initiation of a movement (Libet, Gleason, Wright, & Pearl, 1983;Deecke, Scheid, & Kornhube, 1969). The second examines the neural processing of sensory consequences caused by self-made actions (Aliu, Houde, & Nagarajan, 2009;Martikainen, Kaneko, & Hari, 2005). These components have not only been measured during action-effect tasks to investigate the processing of actions and their consequences independently but also used as evidence to indicate the role predictive processes have when associating our actions with their corresponding effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations into the prediction of consequences have focused on particular components of the sensory ERP. Reductions in the amplitude of the N1 component have been found for sensory effects caused by self-made actions (i.e., self-made effects; Bass, Jacobsen, & Schroger, 2008;Martikainen et al, 2005) in both the auditory domain (Hughes, Desantis, & Waszak, 2013;Knolle, Schroger, & Kotz, 2013;Baess, Horvath, Jacobsen, & Schroger, 2011;Lange, 2011;Aliu et al, 2009) and the visual domain (Gentsch, Kathmann, & Schutz-Bosbach, 2012;Gentsch & Schutz-Bosbach, 2011;Hughes & Waszak, 2011). Even greater decreases in amplitude have been found for selfmade consequences that were predictable compared with self-made effects that were not (Hughes et al, 2013;Knolle et al, 2013;Gentsch et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation