2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
45
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The first reason is that the feedback was given throughout the participant's visual feedback training sessions. In a previous study mentioned above, the 5-min practice session immediately improved the performance of individuals with PD and the improvement was maintained the next day; however, feedback about the knowledge of results (KR) was not provided during the practice trial (only after each practice trial [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first reason is that the feedback was given throughout the participant's visual feedback training sessions. In a previous study mentioned above, the 5-min practice session immediately improved the performance of individuals with PD and the improvement was maintained the next day; however, feedback about the knowledge of results (KR) was not provided during the practice trial (only after each practice trial [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time when we had visited the participant's home and set the Kinect-based system at the beginning of the study, we had confirmed there were no problems in the visibility of visual feedback information such as numeric value and visual images on a PC monitor for the participant. We set the length of the visual feedback training session at 5 min, in accord with study protocol reported in a previous study [26]. In that study, individuals with PD underwent training to perform a balancing task with the self-controlled use of a physical assistance device.…”
Section: In-home Posture Evaluation and Visual Feedback Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies (Chiviacowsky et al, 2012a;Hartman, 2007), learning to balance on a stabilometer platform was facilitated by holding a balance pole horizontally when the use of that pole was chosen by the participants rather than imposed upon them. This finding is particularly interesting because, in a pilot study, Hartman did not find advantages to using the poles for the learning of this task, suggesting that control over an assistive device can have a beneficial effect on learning, even if that device in and of itself is relatively ineffective.…”
Section: Control Over Practice Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when learners were given control over the use of assistive devices on balance tasks, learning was enhanced relative to the externally controlled use of the pole (yoked conditions) (Wulf, Clauss, Shea, & Whitacre, 2001;Wulf & Toole, 1999). In two studies (Chiviacowsky, Wulf, Lewthwaite, & Campos, 2012;Hartman, 2007), learning to balance on a movable platform was facilitated by holding a balance pole in a horizontal position when the use of that pole was controlled by the learner. This finding is particularly interesting because, in a pilot study (Hartman, 2007), no advantages of using the poles were found for the learning of this task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%