2014
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor learning in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: feedback effects on skill acquisition

Abstract: RMSERoot-mean-square error AIM Motor learning is enhanced with practice and feedback. This cohort control study investigated the effect of different relative feedback frequencies during skill acquisition in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and children with typical development.METHOD Nineteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP (nine males, 10 females; mean age 11y 7mo; range 8-16y) and 20 children with typical development (12 males, eight females; mean age 10y 8mo; range 8-14y) were assigned to 100% or reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This significant because it lends justification to the potential use of the normalization algorithms to conduct studies on patients with physical impairment. Physical impairment has often been cited as a confounding factor in motor learning studies, as researchers are unable to determine whether poor results are due to an inability to motor learn or because of physical barriers (Valvano and Rapport, 2006; Burtner et al, 2014; van Abswoude et al, 2015). Using normalization, therapists may be able to evaluate the cognitive ability of a patient independently of their physical impairment, alleviating the compounding factors surrounding motor learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This significant because it lends justification to the potential use of the normalization algorithms to conduct studies on patients with physical impairment. Physical impairment has often been cited as a confounding factor in motor learning studies, as researchers are unable to determine whether poor results are due to an inability to motor learn or because of physical barriers (Valvano and Rapport, 2006; Burtner et al, 2014; van Abswoude et al, 2015). Using normalization, therapists may be able to evaluate the cognitive ability of a patient independently of their physical impairment, alleviating the compounding factors surrounding motor learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors promote the well-developed “assist-as-needed” (AAN) paradigm (Jezernik et al, 2004) while others suggest that error-augmentation (EA) is more effective (Patton et al, 2006). The most recent evidence suggests that the answer depends on a range of factors, from frequency of feedback to initial skill level (Wulf et al, 2010; Burtner et al, 2014; Marchal-Crespo et al, 2015; Fujii et al, 2016). In other words, the potential for motor learning is largely subject-dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the computations needed for successful motor function are preserved in CP. For example, children with CP retain the ability to learn and show improvements in movement accuracy with practice, although less than in typically-developing (TD) children [ 36 ]. Children with CP have intact internal models of their own movement variability, being able to take into account their own motor variability when moving to reach a target [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where a body part is not in use, the representation area of this part in the brain shrinks and vice versa (Burtner et al, 2014). When a specific part is continuously and widely used, the area representing that part in the brain is enlarged.…”
Section: Physiotherapy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a specific part is continuously and widely used, the area representing that part in the brain is enlarged. In the case of a brain injury that damages the representation of a part of the body in the primary motor cortex, plasticity will permit reorganisation to restore a representation (Burtner et al, 2014). While the primary motor cortex is the main and most powerful contributor to the corticospinal tract, the premotor cortex is also a secondary less powerful contributor.…”
Section: Physiotherapy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%