2020
DOI: 10.1113/jp278890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor learning induces time‐dependent plasticity that is observable at the spinal cord level

Abstract: The spinal cord is an important contributor to motor learning r It remains unclear whether short-term spinal cord adaptations are general or task-specific r Immediately after task acquisition, neural adaptations were not specific to the trained task (i.e. were general) r Twenty-four hours after acquisition, neural adaptations appeared to be task-specific r The neural reorganization and generalization of spinal adaptations appears to be timedependent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(155 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We detail the effects of healthy ageing on MVT and MU firing characteristics using linear mixed effects models. More specifically, we took into consideration all of our data points rather than averaging across them and based our analysis on the mean within an individual trial or subject (Giboin et al 2020). All of these analysis were performed in R (R Core Team 2020, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) using the lme4 package (Bates et al, 2015) and significance was calculated using the lmerTest package (Kuznetsova et al 2017), which applies Satterthwaite's method to estimate degrees of freedom and generate P-values for mixed effects models by comparing the full model including the effect of interest against a null model excluding the effect of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We detail the effects of healthy ageing on MVT and MU firing characteristics using linear mixed effects models. More specifically, we took into consideration all of our data points rather than averaging across them and based our analysis on the mean within an individual trial or subject (Giboin et al 2020). All of these analysis were performed in R (R Core Team 2020, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) using the lme4 package (Bates et al, 2015) and significance was calculated using the lmerTest package (Kuznetsova et al 2017), which applies Satterthwaite's method to estimate degrees of freedom and generate P-values for mixed effects models by comparing the full model including the effect of interest against a null model excluding the effect of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We detail the effects of healthy aging on MU firing characteristics using linear mixed effects models. More specifically, we take into consideration all of our data points rather than averaging across them and basing our analysis on the mean within an individual trial or subject (Giboin et al, 2020). All of these analysis were performed in R (R Core Team 2020, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AUT) using the lme4 package (Bates & Maechler, 2015) and significance was calculated using the lmerTest package (Kuznetsova et al, 2017), which applies Satterthwaite's method to estimate degrees of freedom and generate p-values for mixed effects models by comparing the full model including the effect of interest against a null model excluding the effect of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this is that the acute increase in LEP was a result of 'reactive plasticity' , in which general, possibly compensatory, changes at the spinal cord occur due to a change in the activity of surrounding networks directly implicated in the task, i.e. those involved in 'primary plasticity' (Giboin, Tokuno, Kramer, Henry, & Gruber, 2020;Wolpaw, 2010). In turn, this could induce secondary changes in spinal pathways not directly implicated in the task, in our case leading to an increase in LEP amplitude during both the IS and KE.…”
Section: Further Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, this could induce secondary changes in spinal pathways not directly implicated in the task, in our case leading to an increase in LEP amplitude during both the IS and KE. Subsequently, time-dependent, task-specific neural reorganisation might have occurred throughout the training period, meaning that spinal alterations could only be observed during the task itself (Giboin et al, 2020). Despite the more task-specific nature of the IS, the differences in characteristics of the dynamic squats involved in the task (see 'limitations' section)…”
Section: Further Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%