2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor-like neural dynamics in two parietal areas during arm reaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, rotational dynamics were observed not only in MC, but also in somatosensory cortex during the posture perturbation and reaching tasks. Rotational dynamics were observed in S1 (areas 3 a and 1), A2 and A5, and a recent study has even identified rotational dynamics in the rostral areas of posterior parietal cortex (V6a, Diomedi et al, 2021 ). These areas reflect important components of frontoparietal circuits involved in the planning and execution of arm motor function ( Chowdhury et al, 2020 ; Kalaska, 1996 ; Kalaska et al, 1990 ; Omrani et al, 2016 ; Takei et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Third, rotational dynamics were observed not only in MC, but also in somatosensory cortex during the posture perturbation and reaching tasks. Rotational dynamics were observed in S1 (areas 3 a and 1), A2 and A5, and a recent study has even identified rotational dynamics in the rostral areas of posterior parietal cortex (V6a, Diomedi et al, 2021 ). These areas reflect important components of frontoparietal circuits involved in the planning and execution of arm motor function ( Chowdhury et al, 2020 ; Kalaska, 1996 ; Kalaska et al, 1990 ; Omrani et al, 2016 ; Takei et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fitted model parameters include transition probabilities, which define the likelihood of transitioning from any given state to any other state, and emission probabilities, which govern the generation of observable data within each state. Classic frequentist HMMs applied to neural data have used a univariate multinomial distribution for emission probabilities (Bollimunta et al, 2012; Mazurek et al, 2018; Diomedi et al, 2021), encoding which of N neurons is spiking in each time bin, and choosing a random neuron if multiple neurons spike in the same bin. Such an approach does not capture the multivariate nature of neural population activity measured with high density recordings, nor the statistical distribution of neural spiking, and breaks down as larger neural populations are recorded from.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitted model parameters include transition probabilities, which define the likelihood of transitioning from any given state to any other state, and emission probabilities, which govern the generation of observable data within each state. Classic frequentist HMMs applied to neural data have used a univariate multinomial distribution for emission probabilities (Bollimunta et al, 2012; Mazurek et al, 2018; Diomedi et al, 2021), encoding which of N neurons is spiking in each time bin, and choosing a random neuron if multiple neurons spike in the same bin. Such an approach does not capture the multivariate nature of neural population activity measured with high density recordings, nor the statistical distribution of neural spiking, and breaks down as larger neural populations are recorded from.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%