New interventional approaches have been proposed in the last few years to treat the motor deficits resulting from brain lesions. Training protocols represent the gold-standard of these approaches. However, the degree of motor recovery experienced by most patients remains incomplete. It would be important to improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying functional recovery. This chapter examines the role of two possible mechanisms that could operate to improve motor function in this setting: volition and motor imagery. It is argued that both represent possible strategies to enhance training effects.Key Words: motivation, attention, motor imagery, hemiparesis, rehabilitation, forced use, volition, stroke, motor system, motor cortex (Cog Behav Neurol 2006;19:135-140) M otor training protocols represent one of the fundamental bases of rehabilitative treatments after brain damage. Different strategies have been proposed to enhance training effects, including enhanced motivation, focused attention, motor imagery, progressive transfer of tasks towards the paretic limb, forced use, and integration of multimodal and emotional settings. The neural mechanisms underlying these strategies are poorly understood. In this review, we describe studies performed to better understand the influence of some of these factors on performance improvements and changes in intracortical excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms in humans undergoing training protocols. Focus is on the role of (a) volition in motor learning, (b) imagery in neurorehabilitation and motor control, and (c) neural substrates underlying performance of simple and complex movements after stroke.
ROLE OF VOLITION IN MOTOR LEARNINGMotor training protocols in patients with brain lesions elicit well-described changes in brain organization and performance improvements. [1][2][3][4][5][6] One limitation of training protocols is that patients with more profound weakness are unable to carry out the motor routines required. The finding that passively elicited motions lead to activation and cortical reorganization in brain regions common to those activated with performance of voluntary movements suggested that it could also elicit improvements in motor function. 7,8 This proposal has important implications for the design of neurorehabilitative treatments after stroke, particularly in patients who are too weak to perform effective voluntary motor training.One recent study compared behavioral gains after short-term motor learning, changes in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation in the contralateral primary motor cortex (cM1) and in motor cortex excitability measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) after a 30 minute training period consisting of either voluntarily or passively induced wrist movements in 2 different sessions in healthy volunteers. 9 During active training, subjects were instructed to perform voluntary wrist flexion-extension movements of a specified duration in an articulated splint. Therefore, voluntary movements f...