1998
DOI: 10.1007/s004210050439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor unit activation patterns during concentric wrist flexion in humans with different muscle fibre composition

Abstract: Muscle activity was recorded from the flexor carpi radialis muscle during static and dynamic-concentric wrist flexion in six subjects, who had exhibited large differences in histochemically identified muscle fibre composition. Motor unit recruitment patterns were identified by sampling 310 motor units and counting firing rates in pulses per second (pps). During concentric wrist flexion at 30% of maximal exercise intensity the mean firing rate was 27 (SD 13) pps. This was around twice the value of 12 (SD 5) pps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, neural factors responsible for the reduction in neural drive inhibition (from 60°AEs -1 to 120°AEs -1 ) are not clearly understood and could be attributed to either or both additional recruited motor units and/or an increase in the firing rate. However, according to Søgaard et al (1998), the possibility of changes in firing rate could be excluded as a factor in the increase in neural drive. Indeed, these authors have observed that even during slow sub-maximal voluntary concentric wrist flexions (30°AEs -1 ; intensity ranging from 30% to 60% maximal voluntary efforts), firing rate could attain the leveling off of the sigmoidal force/firing rate curve (i.e., area causing only minimal torque augmentations with frequency intensification).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, neural factors responsible for the reduction in neural drive inhibition (from 60°AEs -1 to 120°AEs -1 ) are not clearly understood and could be attributed to either or both additional recruited motor units and/or an increase in the firing rate. However, according to Søgaard et al (1998), the possibility of changes in firing rate could be excluded as a factor in the increase in neural drive. Indeed, these authors have observed that even during slow sub-maximal voluntary concentric wrist flexions (30°AEs -1 ; intensity ranging from 30% to 60% maximal voluntary efforts), firing rate could attain the leveling off of the sigmoidal force/firing rate curve (i.e., area causing only minimal torque augmentations with frequency intensification).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, during both maximal and sub-maximal voluntary contractions, the firing rate for Con60 and Con120 could be close to maximal. According to this experiment (Søgaard et al 1998), performed in a different muscle group, it may be speculated that additional recruited motor units would regulate primarily the neural drive increase (with increasing concentric angular velocity beyond 60°AEs -1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, when used to measure interspike intervals, intramuscular EMG provides information regarding the activity of only a few motor units at most. Bellemare et al [12] indicated that motor unit firing rates ranged from 12 to 60 Hz for the biceps brachii during an isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the forearm flexors, and Søgaard et al [81] reported firing rates between 7 and 43 Hz for the flexor carpi radialis during an isometric muscle action of the wrist flexors at 60% MVC. Thus, it is unlikely that all motor units are firing at the same frequency, even during an isometric muscle action at a steady torque level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Subsequently, De Luca et al (1996) have shown ranges of ®ring rates of 7±30 impulses á s )1 for ECRL and 5±25 impulses á s )1 for ECU with changes in force from 0 to 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Sùgaard et al (1998) have demonstrated dependence of mean ®ring rates on dynamic compared to static isometric contractions. For example, during dynamic contractions, ®ring rates changed from 27 to 30 impulses á s )1 when force changed from 15% to 30% MVC.…”
Section: Motoneuron Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%