2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor unit firing behavior during prolonged 50% MVC dorsiflexion contractions in young and older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…have recorded motor unit discharge rate during sustained contractions performed by older adults and have either indicated no reduction in discharge rate for both young and old adults during a sustained submaximal contraction (Christie and Kamen 2009) or a similar decline in discharge rate for young and old adults during intermittent contractions (Rubinstein and Kamen 2005). In agreement with previous findings, the mean discharge rate in the current study did not change from the first 20% to the last 20% epoch of the nearly 60-s contraction (P ϭ 0.091).…”
Section: Discharge Characteristics Of Motor Units In Old Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have recorded motor unit discharge rate during sustained contractions performed by older adults and have either indicated no reduction in discharge rate for both young and old adults during a sustained submaximal contraction (Christie and Kamen 2009) or a similar decline in discharge rate for young and old adults during intermittent contractions (Rubinstein and Kamen 2005). In agreement with previous findings, the mean discharge rate in the current study did not change from the first 20% to the last 20% epoch of the nearly 60-s contraction (P ϭ 0.091).…”
Section: Discharge Characteristics Of Motor Units In Old Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the final 25% of the task we observed a decrease in motor unit discharge rate in 11 of the 13 motor units. This anomalous decrease in SMU discharge rate observed concurrently with an increase in central drive has been observed previously in upper Mottram, 2004;Riley et al, 2008a) and lower (Kuchinad et al, 2004;Christie & Kamen, 2009;Dalton et al, 2010) limb muscles and is possibly due to reduced spinal motoneurone responsiveness, which impairs the ability to integrate increased cortical input (McNeil et al, 2011a;. Reduced spinal motoneurone responsiveness may occur as a result of intrinsic motoneurone adaptation (due to repetitive discharge) (Kernell & Monster, 1982;McNeil et al, 2011b) and reflex inhibition by Group III and IV afferents (Rotto & Kaufman, 1988).…”
Section: Peak Discharge Ratesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The target force was set at 1.5 times the recruitment threshold for the target unit. Participants were strongly encouraged to maintain the target force until failure, which was defined as when the force recording dropped by more than 5% of the target force trace for a period of more than 5 seconds and could not subsequently return to the target force level (Christie & Kamen, 2009;Vila-Cha et al, 2010). In a number of the fatigue trials additional motor units could be identified and discriminated from the beginning of the fatigue task.…”
Section: Fatigue Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations