2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3<185::aid-em5>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus gene mutation assay: International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures Workgroup report

Abstract: The Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) Workgroup addressed and reached consensus on a number of issues. Discussion focused on five areas: (1) acceptable assay versions; (2) cytotoxicity measure; (3) 24‐hr treatment; (4) microwell colony counting and sizing; and (5) data acceptability/statistical analysis. Although the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) indicated a preference for the microwell over the soft agar method, all of the workgroup members agreed that both versions of the MLA are equally acceptabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, what is the effect on mutant frequency of dilution of slow growing small tk 2/2 colony mutant over time in culture? Small colony mutants are considered to be formed from deletions of chromosome 11 extending beyond the TK gene yielding a slower growing phenotype [Moore et al, 1985[Moore et al, , 2007. Furthermore, the cell karyotype may also be expected to change over time, especially for a transformed mammalian cell line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, what is the effect on mutant frequency of dilution of slow growing small tk 2/2 colony mutant over time in culture? Small colony mutants are considered to be formed from deletions of chromosome 11 extending beyond the TK gene yielding a slower growing phenotype [Moore et al, 1985[Moore et al, , 2007. Furthermore, the cell karyotype may also be expected to change over time, especially for a transformed mammalian cell line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thymidine kinase proficient cells are sensitive to TFT, which causes the inhibition of cellular metabolism and halts further cell division. Thus the mutant cells are able to proliferate in the presence of TFT, whereas normal cells which contain thymidine kinase are not (Moore et al 2003).…”
Section: Ames Assaymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The lowest positive concentration in the absence of S9 was 65 lg/mL. Although criteria for the determination of positive response in the lymphoma assay remained controversial according to the criteria used by the laboratory that conducted in these studies (Clive et al 1979;Moore et al 2003).These results can be interpreted as week toxicity. With longer exposures (about 24 h), higher capsaicin concentrations were too toxic for analysis and the mutant fractions were not significantly different from the controls at the usable concentrations.…”
Section: Chromosomal Aberration In Hpblsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IWGT held six meetings and reached consensus on several important aspects for conducting the assay and interpretation of the data. This working group recommended individual experiment acceptance criteria for both the microwell and soft‐agar versions of the MLA and developed an approach for interpreting data to provide more biologically relevant results (Moore et al , , , , , ). For the agar version of the MLA, a response is considered positive if the induced mutant frequency meets or exceeds the global evaluation factor (GEF) of 90 × 10 −6 ; for the microwell version of the MLA the GEF is 126 × 10 −6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the NTP database represents a large portion of the data and is readily available online, we chose to review those data. We utilized the significant modifications for data evaluation that were developed in recent years under the auspice of IWGT (Moore et al , , , , ) and included in OECD TG490 (OECD ), for our re‐evaluation. This manuscript presents the re‐evaluation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%