2001
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/10.8.845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouse tissue culture models of unstable triplet repeats: in vitro selection for larger alleles, mutational expansion bias and tissue specificity, but no association with cell division rates

Abstract: The expansion of CAG.CTG trinucleotide repeats has been associated with an increasing number of human diseases. Once into the expanded disease-associated range, the repeats become dramatically unstable in the germline and also throughout the soma. Instability is expansion-biased, contributing towards the unusual genetics, and most likely the tissue-specificity and progressive nature of the symptoms. Such expansions constitute a unique form of dynamic mutation whose mechanism is poorly understood. It is general… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Cell cultures derived from the eyes, kidneys, and lungs from these transgenic mice demonstrated different levels of repeat instability, independent of cell proliferation rate. 23 Similar observations have been made in humans with myotonic dystrophy type 1, as larger repeat lengths are consistently observed in muscle compared to blood DNA. [25][26][27] Although we favor the possibility of tissue-specific factors influencing microsatellite instability, there is currently no experimental evidence to support this in HNPCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 Cell cultures derived from the eyes, kidneys, and lungs from these transgenic mice demonstrated different levels of repeat instability, independent of cell proliferation rate. 23 Similar observations have been made in humans with myotonic dystrophy type 1, as larger repeat lengths are consistently observed in muscle compared to blood DNA. [25][26][27] Although we favor the possibility of tissue-specific factors influencing microsatellite instability, there is currently no experimental evidence to support this in HNPCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A third possible explanation for the decreased microsatellite instability in extra-colonic cancers is that cis and/or trans acting tissue-specific factors, along with defects in MLH1 or MSH2, play a role in determining instability of microsatellites. 23 Evidence that supports this explanation comes from transgenic mouse models of unstable CAGKCTG repeats, which are expanded in diseases such as myotonic dystrophy type 1, Huntington's disease, fragile X syndrome, Friedreich's ataxia, and spinocerebellar ataxias. 24 Cell cultures derived from the eyes, kidneys, and lungs from these transgenic mice demonstrated different levels of repeat instability, independent of cell proliferation rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise mechanism by which somatic mosaicism arises remains unknown, but it is assumed that it must involve the misalignment of repeats to generate small loops, hairpins or other alternative non-B-DNA structures [1,17,18]. Although the repeats may be unstable during replication, the lack of a correlation between tissue-specific somatic mosaicism and cell proliferation and the accumulation of high levels of somatic mosaicism in post-mitotic tissues such as brain and muscle [11,12,20,[26][27][28][29], suggest the primary mechanism is cell division independent. Evidence from transgenic mouse models also implicates a major role for several of the DNA mismatch repair proteins [30 -33], and inappropriate DNA mismatch repair of alternative structures presents as an attractive mechanism [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, their role in causing expansion is difficult to test. Further, tests of expansion among cell types have not always painted a consistent picture due to the fact that the effects of strand breaks cannot be separated from the effects of replication in proliferating cells [67][68][69][70][71][72][78][79][80]. However, the use of transgenic animals has been particularly informative [70,[80][81][82][83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms By Which Mmr Might Cause Cag Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%