1981
DOI: 10.1353/sls.1981.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mouth Position & Mouth Movement in Norwegian Sign Language

Abstract: This paper reports some highlights from a study of 37 signs taken from video recordings of deaf children and adults in natural discourse. The relation of mouth expression to other components is outlined and a tentative coding system is presented. Implications for the education of deaf children are also discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…‘looplooploop’, English ‘walkwalkwalk’). These repetitions typically follow the repetition of the manual movements (see Section 3.3 below), which appear to be identical to aspectual modulations of the sign's movement indicating a repeated action (see Vogt-Svendsen 2001 for a similar pattern in Norwegian Sign Language). The rhythmic parallel is similar to what Woll (2001) called ‘echo phonology’: identity of movement properties between hands and mouth.…”
Section: Marking Focus In Ngtmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…‘looplooploop’, English ‘walkwalkwalk’). These repetitions typically follow the repetition of the manual movements (see Section 3.3 below), which appear to be identical to aspectual modulations of the sign's movement indicating a repeated action (see Vogt-Svendsen 2001 for a similar pattern in Norwegian Sign Language). The rhythmic parallel is similar to what Woll (2001) called ‘echo phonology’: identity of movement properties between hands and mouth.…”
Section: Marking Focus In Ngtmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…After Vogt-Svendsen's (1981 pioneering studies on Norwegian Sign Language, one of the first in-depth descriptions of the co-occurring activity of the hands and the mouth is Schermer's (1990) dissertation on NGT. Schermer analysed the signing of six informants who retold a written story and a story from a picture book, and who, in addition, were engaged in a short stretch of spontaneous conversation.…”
Section: Mouth Actions Mouth Gestures Mouthingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes mouth gestures add information about manner or degree, and in yet other cases, they are simply co-articulated with the sign without contributing any special meaning, even though they appear to be obligatory. Many studies have described mouthings and mouth gestures (Ebbinghaus & Hessmann (2001) for DGS; Rainò (2001) for Finnish Sign Language (FinSL); Sutton-Spence & Woll (1999) and Lewin & Schembri (2011) for BSL; Vogt-Svendsen (1983) for Norwegian Sign Language (NSL), Sutton-Spence & Boyes Braem (2001) and Crasborn et al (2008) for BSL, NGT and Swedish Sign Language (SSL); and Bank et al (2011) and Bank (2014) for NGT), and there is much debate in the field of sign language research on the linguistic status of mouthings, namely on the question whether they are part of the phonological specification of signs or should rather be considered a performance phenomenon due to language contact. In Section 5, we will propose that they assign a range to an open syntactic position (see Section 5).…”
Section: Studies On Noun-verb Pairs In Sign Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%