Movement and dispersal patterns in the bush cricket<i>Pholidoptera griseoaptera</i>: the role of developmental stage and sex

Diekötter, Tim; Csencsics, Daniela; Rothenbühler, C.; Billeter, Regula; Edwards, Peter J.

doi:10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00714.x

Cited by 37 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The percentages of marked individuals seen again are comparable with those recorded in other studies on Orthoptera (Heller & von Helversen, 1990;Kindvall et al, 1998;Diekötter et al, 2005Diekötter et al, , 2007. Marking with reflective material has resulted in day-to-day percentages of individuals seen again of more than 80% (Hein et al, 2003;Heidinger et al, 2009).…”

Section: Percentage Of the Marked Individuals That Were Seen Againsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Uhu instant adhesive without solvent and pungent vapours, was used as the adhesive, as recommended by Ingrisch & Köhler (1998). All individuals of M. roeselii were captured just before the start of the experiment and kept individually in cool boxes before and after marking (Hein et al, 2003;Diekötter et al, 2005Diekötter et al, , 2007.…”

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At each site 72 marked individuals of M. roeselii (36 brachypters, 36 macropters) were released within a radius of 1 m around each release point. On the following 11 nights, using headlamps the area within a radius of 300 m, and occasionally within a radius of 500 m, around each release point was searched carefully for marked individuals (Diekötter et al, 2005(Diekötter et al, , 2007. No marked individuals were found outside the 300 m radius during the entire study period.…”

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the mobility of many species of Orthoptera has been studied (Kindvall et al, 1998;Leisnham & Jamieson, 2002;Hein et al, 2003;Gardiner & Hill, 2004;Diekötter et al, 2005), nothing is known about the locomotory behaviour of macropters. Indeed, observations on the flight of long-winged individuals suggest that this morph is much more mobile than its short-winged conspecifics (Higaki & Ando, 2003;Smith, 2007;Gardiner, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Does wing dimorphism affect mobility in Metrioptera roeselii (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)?

Poniatowski¹,

Fartmann²

2011

Eur. J. Entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Range shifts are among the most conspicuous effects of global warming. Marked changes in distribution are recorded both for highly mobile species of insects, which are capable of flight, and wing-dimorphic species with predominantly short-winged individuals. One of these species is the bush-cricket Metrioptera roeselii, which occasionally produces long-winged individuals. However, there is little known about the locomotory behaviour of wing-dimorphic insects. Yet to be able to predict potential range shifts it is necessary to know the dispersal potential of macropters. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in which individually marked M. roeselii were released at four sites. Different movement parameters, such as daily movement, activity radius, dispersal range, net displacement and crowding rate, were calculated. The statistical analyses showed that the movement of long-winged and shortwinged individuals did not differ, but the percentage of individuals that were not seen again was twice as high for long-winged bushcrickets. These results suggest that most of the long-winged individuals that were seen again did not fly; i.e., they had the same basic mobility as the short-winged individuals. However, the comparatively low number of long-winged individuals that were seen again suggests that at least some macropters are long-distance dispersers, which is relevant for the dispersal process. The comparison of sexes showed that males were significantly more mobile than females. This sex-specific locomotory behaviour in M. roeselii might depend on a complex series of social interactions and physiological conditions.

show abstract

Section: Percentage Of the Marked Individuals That Were Seen Againsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Does wing dimorphism affect mobility in Metrioptera roeselii (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)?

Poniatowski¹,

Fartmann²

2011

Eur. J. Entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the brachypterous bushcricket P. griseoaptera was recorded most frequenly and was the most abundant species in all deforested plots where dead wood, shrubs and ecotones abounded (cf. Diekötter et al, 2005Diekötter et al, , 2009. Of the Caelifera group, the most frequent species in all age categories of clear-cuts was the long-winged species C. vagans, which is an inhabitant of forest edges and sparse forests (Hochkirch et al, 2008).…”

Section: Colonization Of Clear-cuts By Orthopteramentioning

confidence: 99%

Response of Orthoptera to clear-cuts in beech forests

Sliacka¹,

Krištín²,

Naďo³

2013

Eur. J. Entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nontarget catches of traps with chemical lures may refer to the flower‐visitation, probable pollination, and feeding of bush crickets (Ensifera: Tettigoniidae)

Nagy

Ősz

Tóth

et al. 2023

Ecology and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The diurnal bees, lepidopterans, and other pollinators are among the most studied flower-visiting insect taxa. They mostly play distinct functions in temperate grasslands and ecotones of grassland-forest mosaics (such as in forest steppes). Although orthopterans are widely distributed in these habitats, however, their flower visitation is nearly unknown, especially in the temperate zone. During the development of traps with chemical lures to catch Lepidoptera pests, large numbers of Orthoptera were caught that provide a chance for studying the flower visitation and odor and indirectly the host plant preference of seven temperate zone Tettigoniidae species.Data on the attractivity of isoamyl alcohol-based semisynthetic lures for Meconema thalassinum and efficiency of phenylacetaldehyde-based lures on Leptophyes albovittata and Phaneroptera falcata were reported for the first time. Additionally, analysis of nature photos collected from internet sources, as part of a passive citizen science also supports the revealed preference of these species. Based on photos, the studied orthopterans mainly visit Asteraceae species including the most preferred Tanacetum vulgare, Pulicaria dysenterica, Achillea millefolium, Solidago canadensis, and Centaurea scabiosa. Based on catches of volatile traps, the first data were recorded on the attractivity of phenylacetaldehyde-and isoamyl alcohol-based lures on three temperate zone Orthoptera species. Results of a passive citizen science study strengthen these results that may increase the knowledge on the host plant and habitat preference of Orthoptera species.

show abstract

Movement and dispersal patterns in the bush cricketPholidoptera griseoaptera: the role of developmental stage and sex

Cited by 37 publications

References 38 publications

Does wing dimorphism affect mobility in Metrioptera roeselii (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)?

Does wing dimorphism affect mobility in Metrioptera roeselii (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)?

Response of Orthoptera to clear-cuts in beech forests

Nontarget catches of traps with chemical lures may refer to the flower‐visitation, probable pollination, and feeding of bush crickets (Ensifera: Tettigoniidae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About