Movement and Maneuver: Culture and the Competition for Influence Among the U.S. Military Services

Zimmerman, S. Rebecca; Jackson, Kimberly; Lander, Natasha; Roberts, Colin; Madden, Dan; Orrie, Rebeca

doi:10.7249/rr2270

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of subcultures within the military, exploring differences in acculturation by a branch of service may be appropriate for tailoring cultural intervention and prevention efforts. Examining subcultures is especially important, given the heterogeneity in cultural values across branches of service (Zimmerman et al, 2019) and the importance of culture to deleterious outcomes in veterans (e.g., suicide; Defense Suicide Prevention Office, 2019).…”

Section: Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validating military culture: The factor analysis of a military-related adaptation of acculturation in veterans.

Tkachuck¹,

Pavlacic²,

Raley³

et al. 2022

Psychological Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validating military culture: The factor analysis of a military-related adaptation of acculturation in veterans.

Tkachuck¹,

Pavlacic²,

Raley³

et al. 2022

Psychological Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A discussion of such differences, which range from differences in training to differences in organizational culture, is beyond the scope of this study. For an in-depth examination of current differences among the U.S. services, see Zimmerman et al (2019). Air-related operations and concerns emerged as a structural cluster requiring a corresponding management structure.…”

Section: Simple Complicated Complex and Complex Adaptive Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leveraging Complexity in Great-Power Competition and Warfare: Volume II, Technical Details for a Complex Adaptive Systems Lens

Lingel¹,

Sargent²,

Gulden³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern warfare is characterized by a complex environment of operations spanning multiple domains leveraged to achieve advantage against the adversary in both strategic competition and armed conflict. However, understanding complexity in warfare, often referred to as the art of war, is rarely framed in a structured way. This report seeks to provide an initial examination of how complex adaptive systems thinking can frame opportunities and challenges of complexity in warfare. This report is the second of a two-volume report. It provides the technical details in support of the first volume, Leveraging Complexity in Great-Power Competition and Warfare: Volume I, An Initial Exploration of How Complex Adaptive Systems Thinking Can Frame Opportunities and Challenges. Three topics are covered in this volume: a literature review of complex adaptive systems research, a complex adaptive systems lens user manual, and a Markov chain formulation of the adversary decision process. This report should be of interest to warfighting planners, wargamers, complex adaptive systems researchers, and the military science and technology community.

show abstract

Measurement invariance of suicide screening measures across military branch

Heath

Vogel

Vidales

et al. 2021

Military Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Movement and Maneuver: Culture and the Competition for Influence Among the U.S. Military Services

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Validating military culture: The factor analysis of a military-related adaptation of acculturation in veterans.

Validating military culture: The factor analysis of a military-related adaptation of acculturation in veterans.

Leveraging Complexity in Great-Power Competition and Warfare: Volume II, Technical Details for a Complex Adaptive Systems Lens

Measurement invariance of suicide screening measures across military branch

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About