Movement and Survival of Wild Chinook Salmon Smolts from Butte Creek During Their Out‐Migration to the Ocean: Comparison of a Dry Year versus a Wet Year

Abstract

California's Central Valley (CCV) Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha stocks have declined substantially since the mid‐1800s, with most listed as threatened or endangered or heavily supplemented by hatcheries. As the largest population of CCV wild spring‐run Chinook Salmon, Butte Creek fish are an important source for promoting life history diversity in the CCV Chinook Salmon community. However, little information exists on Butte Creek juvenile mortality during out‐migration to the ocean, which is considered a critical phase in the overall population dynamics. We used the Juvenile Salmon Acoustic Telemetry System to track the movement of individual fish, and we used a mark–recapture modeling framework to estimate survival of migrating wild Chinook Salmon smolts from lower Butte Creek to ocean entry at the Golden Gate Bridge. Survival and migration varied significantly among years; in 2015, which was a dry year, Chinook Salmon smolts migrated more slowly throughout their migratory corridor and exhibited lower survival than in a wetter year (2016); among locations, fish migrated faster and experienced higher survival in the lower Sacramento River than in the Sutter Bypass and the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta. Our data suggest that higher flow at release and larger fish lengths both resulted in increased survival. Our findings shed light on a critical phase of wild spring‐run juvenile Chinook Salmon dynamics and could help to inform future restoration and management projects that would improve the survival and abundance of the CCV spring‐run Chinook Salmon populations.

Behavioral Response of Juvenile Chinook Salmon to Surgical Implantation of Micro‐acoustic Transmitters

“…; Cordoleani et al. ). In fisheries studies worldwide, it is relatively common for run‐of‐the‐river fish to be captured in a rotary screw trap, tagged with a transmitter, and subsequently released within 24 h of tagging—and often within 1–4 h of tagging.…”

“…; Cordoleani et al. ). For example, in some contexts, telemetry may represent a significant improvement over a traditional mark–recapture framework, which has long struggled with obtaining statistically significant recapture information (Hilborn et al.…”

“…; Notch ; Cordoleani et al. ). As the size of the transmitters continues to be reduced, guidelines on suitable transmitter : body weight ratios continue to be challenged (Brown et al.…”

“…Acoustic telemetry is a valuable tool for studying the movement, survival rates, and ecology of aquatic organisms (e.g., Eckert and Stewart 2001;Ng et al 2007;Cooke et al 2013;Cordoleani et al 2018). For example, in some contexts, telemetry may represent a significant improvement over a traditional mark-recapture framework, which has long struggled with obtaining statistically significant recapture information (Hilborn et al 1976;Dudgeon et al 2015;Hussey et al 2015).…”

“…Continual technological advances facilitating the miniaturization of acoustic transmitters have allowed for the tracking of smaller and smaller species and earlier life history stages (McMichael et al 2010). These advances have led to a proliferation of research investigating freshwater and early marine survival of many species of juvenile salmonids (Michel et al 2013;Gibson et al 2015;Deng et al 2017;Johnson et al 2017;Klimley et al 2017b;Notch 2017;Cordoleani et al 2018). As the size of the transmitters continues to be reduced, guidelines on suitable transmitter : body weight ratios continue to be challenged (Brown et al 1999).…”