2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement assessment of breast and organ-at-risks using free-breathing, self-gating 4D magnetic resonance imaging workflow for breast cancer radiation therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that 4D-MRI is a promising technique for lung tumor delineation and motion assessment with greater robustness against inter-fractional changes than 4D-CT-based radiotherapy [ 37 ]. Previous studies have reported results when applying 4D-MRI for target volumes [ 37 ], whereas thoracic OARs were studied less frequently [ 38 ]. Thus, when considering motion management in SBRT for central lung tumors, 4D-MRI can be considered a promising technology for an optimal balance of toxicities and tumor control [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that 4D-MRI is a promising technique for lung tumor delineation and motion assessment with greater robustness against inter-fractional changes than 4D-CT-based radiotherapy [ 37 ]. Previous studies have reported results when applying 4D-MRI for target volumes [ 37 ], whereas thoracic OARs were studied less frequently [ 38 ]. Thus, when considering motion management in SBRT for central lung tumors, 4D-MRI can be considered a promising technology for an optimal balance of toxicities and tumor control [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) systems are commercially available for monitoring the breast tissue during radiotherapy without additional imaging dose [12] , [17] , however, alignment errors observed by SGRT have been found to have a weak correlation with alignment errors observed in internal anatomy [15] and so cannot be used to replace a comprehensive image-guided radiotherapy regime [18] . 4DMRI studies have demonstrated intra-fraction motion of organs at risk [19] and complex motion of breast and nodal volumes [20] .The combination of SGRT with real-time EPID monitoring would be complementary, allowing for simultaneous monitoring of the breast surface and internal anatomy on conventional linacs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to accurately evaluate the displacement of the heart and its substructures caused by periodic cardiac activity and calculate the compensatory extension range that could be directive in clinical practice when creating a radiotherapy plan. Many studies have proven that delineation of the pericardium, heart, LVM, and CA system based on planning CT fails to show the real margin of the substructures mentioned above during the cardiac cycle ( 9 - 14 ), and a compensatory margin should be applied. Tong et al calculated the displacements of 1.2±0.9, 0.6±0.5, and 0.6±0.5 mm for the heart, 0.5±0.4, 0.4±0.3, and 0.8±0.6 mm for the pericardium, and 1.0±0.8, 4.1±2.8, and 1.9±1.2 mm for the LVM in the left-right, ventral-dorsal, and caudal-cranial directions by 4D-CT ( 9 ), while Kataria et al suggest radial and cranio-caudal margins of 7 mm and 4 mm, respectively, would cover the range of motions of the coronary artery (CA) on CECT ( 11 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to respiratory movement, the heart is especially influenced by periodic cardiac movement ( 7 , 8 ). According to previous studies ( 9 - 14 ), planning CT that displayed images of the heart and its substructures failed to represent its real morphology, volume, and location, and volume-dose parameters based on planning CT were inaccurate due to these displacements. Tong et al calculated the displacements of 1.2±0.9, 0.6±0.5, and 0.6±0.5 mm for the heart, 0.5±0.4, 0.4±0.3, and 0.8±0.6 mm for the pericardium, and 1.0±0.8, 4.1±2.8, and 1.9±1.2 mm for the left ventricular muscle (LVM) in the left-right, ventral-dorsal, and caudal-cranial directions by 4-dimensional CT (4D-CT) ( 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%